Exposed: Secret Presidential Chemtrail Budget Uncovered – Congress Exceeds Billions To Spray Populace Like Roaches
—The Budget Obama Didn’t Want You To Know About
The Intel Hub
Shepard Ambellas & Avalon
March 30, 2011
© 2011 All Rights Reserved
Geoengineering has now been defined as: “
the deliberate large-scale manipulation of the planetary environment to counteract
anthropogenic climate change.” –
The Royal Society 2009
Recently, the question has been asked,
What In the World Are They Spraying? The documentary with the same name answers many of those questions.
The question the world is now asking is
“Who in the World Is Spraying Us?”
The World is Now Demanding Answers and Accountability…
As an introduction to this article, we will first cover
information to familiarize the uninformed readers as to the core facts
and information so that a more complete understanding is possible, given
this complex issue.
A
recent report by
CBS Atlanta
detailed how some local citizens are outraged that such “crimes against
humanity” are being carried out right before our eyes in secret.
In the report
Sen. Johnny Isakson was interviewed on the subject of chemtrails saying quote
:
“That is a theory that some people have, but there is no evidence this is happening. This is not happening.”
It looks as if members of the government’s upper echelon and even
members of the Senate will go to extreme lengths to suppress this vital
information from reaching the American people.
Not to mention they signed off on the multi-billion dollar per year
budgets in an economic crisis, with little to no transparency to the
public.
Support The Intel Hub – Berkey Light Water Filters, Storable Food, and More(Ad)
In regards to aerosol spraying into the earth’s atmosphere, a recent update to data assembled by
The Carnicom Institute
reveals the chemicals used and their respective levels of
concentration. The toxic levels that are being used in these aerosols
goes beyond shocking – it would appear that these levels are indeed
criminal by
EPA Standards.
An Updated Look at Aerosol Toxins – Part 1
By Dr. Ilya Sandra Perlingieri –
Copyright © 2011 – All Rights Reserved
February 3, 2011
(Excerpt from Report)
A new preliminary draft report by ArizonaSkyWatch
shows dramatic increases in heavy metals that simply do not belong in
our air. NOTE: The level of Manganese is so shockingly high that ArizonaSkyWatch also included additional information about it (see below). This report will be posted online shortly.
This is only a preliminary overview of Arizona Air Particulates.
2010 Air Particulates
These figures indicate how many times they are over the allowable toxic limit:
Aluminum: 15.8
Antimony: 63.3
Arsenic: 418
Barium: 5.3
Cadmium: 6.0
Chromium: 6.4
Copper: 9.0
Iron: 43.5
Lead: 15.7
Manganese: 513.8
Nickel: 10.7
Zinc: 7.5
Additional Research & Videos are at the CaliforniaSkyWatch.com & theAgricultureDefenseCoalition.org.
Interestingly enough,
Monsanto has just released an
Aluminum Resistant Seed which is
Genetically Modified to tolerate Aluminum in high levels in the soil. Is this a coincidence, or do they know something?
“Control oil and you control nations; control food and you control the people.” – Henry Kissinger
See also:
Henry Kissinger National Security Study Memorandum 200
“The common enemy of humanity is man. In searching
for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution,
the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would
fit the bill. All these dangers are caused by human intervention, and
it is only through changed attitudes and behavior that they can be
overcome. The real enemy then, is humanity itself.” – Richard Haass- Club of Rome
Another famous quote;
When the people fear their government, there is
tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty.
Whenever the people are well-informed, they can be trusted with their
own government. - Thomas Jefferson
LINKS FOR CURRENT SOURCES
David Keith GeoEngineering
Fund for Innovative Climate and Energy Research (FICER)
Purpose
The
Fund for Innovative Climate and Energy Research (FICER)
exists to accelerate the innovative development and evaluation of
science and technology to address carbon dioxide and other greenhouse
gas emissions and their environmental consequences.
The non-profit research fund focuses on early-stage innovative
research where relatively small and timely grants can significantly
advance understanding, especially of the viability and scalability of
proposals to address global warming.
Funded research projects are intended to produce peer-reviewed
scholarly articles in recognized professional scientific and technical
journals. Any intellectual property that may be generated in the course
of such research resides with the researchers or their institutions.
Grants for research are provided to the University of Calgary from gifts made by Mr. Bill Gates from his personal funds.
The activities of the Fund for Innovative Climate and Energy Research
fall outside the scope of activities of the Bill & Melinda Gates
Foundation. FICER is not a Foundation project and has no relationship
with it.
The fund has supported research in a wide range of areas. Some examples include:
• understanding carbon dioxide emissions associated with international trade in goods and services;
• developing technologies to capture carbon dioxide out of the air; and
• climate modeling to understand possible environmental consequences of solar radiation management.
Image: Lawrence Livermore National Library
Report On GeoEngineering
A select group of diabolic oligarch globalists and their puppet
cronies embedded within the United States government are now involved in
what some would say are crimes against humanity. These tyrants
will stop at nothing to usher their hush, hush global aerosol agenda
into full swing.
Far surpassing even the most horrific act of terror (real or staged),
posing as literal gods, these globalists will stop at nothing to
control the world by not only controlling the fraudulent banking systems
but by owning the weather through a process (blanket term) called
Geoengineering.
According to globalist sponsored reports, our planet is in a constant
state of threat and is being bombarded with radioactive solar rays
increasing planetary temperatures due to human carbon emissions.
However, vast bodies of research now show that that is not the case
and that global warming is a another globalist myth, a ponzi scheme to
collect a
Carbon Tax worldwide, benefitting the very same group behind the curtain.
The myth the global warming “Carbon Tax” pushers have been spouting
apparently can only be fixed by spraying deadly toxins in an aerosol
particulate form into the earths atmosphere via large sprayer converted
aircraft specifically assigned to perform Geoengineering tasks.
Aerosol sprays (slang: Chemtrails) are
filled with a variety of chemical and metal compounds and are known to
be very hazardous to human, plant, and animal health worldwide. This
danger to plant and human and animal health has been documented in
films such as “What In the World Are They Spraying” by Michael Murphy
& G. Edward Griffin, who have also appeared on the Intel Hub Radio
Show with Shepard Ambellas.
Ultimately, this issue was originally a matter for the EPA to rule
over considering that they have the authority to sanction geoengineering
activities under the National Environmental Policy ACT of
1969. However, documents such as the report to the chairman,
Committee of Science and Technology, House of Representatives – “
Climate Change”
– Sept. 2010, U.S. Gov. Accountability Office which was submitted to
all members of congress in 2010 attempt to put control into the hands of
even a smaller group of people.
This report clearly is slanted and leans to take control away from
the EPA along with other regulatory provisions such as; the Endangered
Species ACT, and the Conformity Provision in the Clean Air ACT – total
Geoengineering dis-info submitted to members of the Congress and other
government branches alike.
The source of most of the dis-info is
Obama’s White House Science Czar John P. Holdren. The following was
written on USGCRP letterhead;
“January 2011,
Members of Congress:
On behalf of the National Science and Technology Council, I am transmitting a copy of Our Changing Planet: The U.S. Global Change Research Program for Fiscal Year 2011.
The report describes the activities and plans of the U.S. Global Change
Research Program (USGCRP) established under the Global Change Research
Act (GCRA) of 1990. The USGCRP coordinates and integrates
scientific research on climate and global change and is supported by 13
participating departments and agencies of the U.S. government. This
Fiscal Year 2011 edition of Our Changing Planet highlights recent
advances and progress made by participating agencies and includes budget
information on each agency’s contribution.
This report describes a program in transition. In accordance with the
GCRA, the USGCRP agencies requested guidance from the National Research
Council on how to best meet the changing needs of the nation to
understand climate change and respond to its impacts, and the NRC
responded with a 2009 report entitled “Restructuring Federal Climate
Research to Meet the Challenges of Climate Change”. In accord with that
report’s recommendations, the USGCRP is undergoing a strategic
realignment that will ensure that the science produced is maximally
useful for decision makers at all scales. As described in the new
edition of Our Changing Planet, the program going forward will place
greater emphasis on impacts, vulnerabilities, and on understanding the
options for adapting to the changing climate. The program will also
continue its long-standing support for activities that contribute to a
better understanding of the Earth system, including observations,
research, and predictive modeling.
All of these focuses will be reflected in the USGCRP’s new strategic plan and its National Climate Assessment.
The USGCRP is committed to its mission to build a knowledge base that
informs human responses to global change through coordinated and
integrated federal programs of research, education, communication, and
decision support. I appreciate the close cooperation of the
participating agencies, and I look forward to working with the Congress
in the continued development and implementation of this essential
national program.
Sincerely,
John P. Holdren Director, Office of Science and Technology Policy Assistant to the President for Science and Technology” – Our Changing Planet
Even more disturbing then that is the fact that your so called
representatives have been approving yearly geoengineering budgets in the
upwards of billions of dollars per year (as outlined in the document
“Our Changing Planet – The US Global Change Research Program for the
Fiscal Year of 2011, which is a supplement to the Presidents Budget for
2011, much of which is unaccounted for and not even included in the
budget possible signifying even a more nefarious plot involving some
black budget.
Back tracking to the year 2001, President elect George W. Bush
established the (CCRI) Climate Change Research Initiative. A year later
it was made public that the USGCRP or United States Global Change
Research program and the CCRI both would become what is known as
the (CCSP) Climate Change Science Program. Now, under the Obama
Administration the legacy continues to move forward as the USGCRP.
Geoengineering Regions
A report entitled “Global Climate Change Impacts in the United
States” released in 2009, documents how the USGCRP divided the US into
nine regions similar to FEMA regions. Also tucked into the report
was the statement “A central finding of the report was that the vast
majority of climate scientists agree that global warming is unequivocal
and primarily human induced” – Source: Our Changing Planet.
The document goes on to mention the devastating effects of climate
change, including the effect on crops, human health and livestock.
But the most startling fact in the document is the actual budget
itself, a mere 2.7 billion for 2011 alone (not including many costs) 24%
higher than 2010’s budget.
The Global Change Research ACT of 1990, SEC. 102, Committee on Earth and Environmental Sciences states;
a) ESTABLISHMENT.–The President, through the Council,
shall establish a Committee on Earth and Environmental Sciences. The
Committee shall carry out Council functions under section 401 of the
National Science and Technology Policy, Organization, and Priorities Act
of 1976 (42 U.S.C. 6651) relating to global change research, for the
purpose of increasing the overall effectiveness and productivity of
Federal global change research efforts.
(b) MEMBERSHIP.–The Committee shall consist of at least one representative from–
1. the National Science Foundation;
2. the National Aeronautics and Space Administration;
3. the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration of the Department of Commerce;
4. the Environmental Protection Agency;
5. the Department of Energy;
6. the Department of State;
7. the Department of Defense;
8. the Department of the Interior;
9. the Department of Agriculture;
10. the Department of Transportation;
11. the Office of Management and Budget;
12. the Office of Science and Technology Policy;
13. the Council on Environmental Quality;
14. the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences of the National Institutes of Health; and
15. such other agencies and departments of the United States as the
President or the Chairman of the Council considers appropriate.
Such representatives shall be high ranking officials of their agency
or department, wherever possible the head of the portion of that agency
or department that is most relevant to the purpose of the title
described in section 101(b).
(c) CHAIRPERSON.–The Chairman of the Council, in consultation with
the Committee, biennially shall select one of the Committee members to
serve as Chairperson. The Chairperson shall be knowledgeable and
experienced with regard to the administration of scientific research
programs, and shall be a representative of an agency that contributes
substantially, in terms of scientific research capability and budget, to
the Program.
(d) SUPPORT PERSONNEL.–An Executive Secretary shall be appointed by the Chairperson of the
Committee, with the approval of the Committee. The Executive
Secretary shall be a permanent employee of one of the agencies or
departments represented on the Committee, and shall remain in the employ
of such agency or department. The Chairman of the Council shall have
the authority to make personnel decisions regarding any employees
detailed to the Council for purposes of working on business of
the Committee pursuant to section 401 of the National Science and
Technology Policy, Organization, and Priorities Act of 1976 (42 U.S.C.
6651).
(e) FUNCTIONS RELATIVE TO GLOBAL CHANGE.–The Council, through the
Committee, shall be responsible for planning and coordinating the
Program. In carrying out this responsibility, the Committee shall–
1. serve as the forum for developing the Plan and for overseeing its implementation;
2. improve cooperation among Federal agencies and departments with respect to global change research activities;
3. provide budgetary advice as specified in section 105;
4. work with academic, State, industry, and other groups conducting global change research, to
provide for periodic public and peer review of the Program;
5. cooperate with the Secretary of State in– (A) providing
representation at international meetings and conferences on global
change research in which the United States participates; and
(B) coordinating the Federal activities of the United States with
programs of other nations and with international global change research
activities such as the International Geosphere-Biosphere Program;
6. consult with actual and potential users of the results of the
Program to ensure that such results are useful in developing national
and international policy responses to global change; and
7. report at least annually to the President and the Congress,
through the Chairman of the Council, on Federal global change research
priorities, policies, and programs.”
The following is a list of the members included in the Subcommittee on Global Change Research;
SUBCOMMITTEE ON GLOBAL CHANGE RESEARCH
Made up of the following members:
- Thomas Karl -Department of Commerce Chair
- Thomas Armstrong - Department of the Interior Vice Chair, Adaptation Research
- Mike Freilich - National Aeronautics and Space Administration Vice Chair, Integrated Observations
- Timothy Killeen - National Science Foundation Vice Chair, Strategic Planning
- William Breed -U.S. Agency for International Development
- John Balbus - Department of Health and Human Services
- William Hohenstein - Department of Agriculture
- Jack Kaye - National Aeronautics and Space Administration
- Chester Koblinsky - Department of Commerce
- Linda Lawson - Department of Transportation
- Leonard Hirsch - Smithsonian Institution
- Anna Palmisano - Department of Energy
A description of the subcommittee on (p.2) Our Changing Planet Reads;
“The USGCRP is
directed by the Subcommittee for Global Change Research (SGCR), which
falls under the National Science and Technology Council. The SGCR
comprises representatives from 13 departments and agencies and is led by
a Chair from one of the participating agencies (currently from the
Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
[NOAA]). In order to align the program’s governance with the
needs, Vice- Chairs have been identified for Strategic Planning,
Integrated Observations, and Adaptation Research. Additional vice-chairs
will be identified as needed. The program is supported by the USGCRP
Integration and Coordination Office and conducts many of its activities
through interagency working groups that plan and implement research and
crosscutting activities, such as communications, decision support, and
information and data concerns. The Office of Science and Technology
Policy (OSTP) and Office of Management and Budget (OMB) work closely
with the SGCR, the Integration and Coordination Office, and the
interagency working groups to establish research priorities and funding
plans to ensure that the program is aligned with national priorities,
reflects agency planning, and meets the requirements of the GCRA. “
The Subcommittee in question has now supplied the President
with a supplement to the fiscal budget for 2011, which was presented to
members of congress in January of 2011 on behalf of the National
Science and Technology Policy – Assistant to the President for Science
and Technology, John P. Holdren.
The (USGCRP)
brings together a total of 13 different agencies and merges them into
one single agency program that has been in the works science 1988 or
prior.
In 1990 the USGCRP received generous congressional support under
(GCRA P.L. 101-606). It is no mystery that aerosol spraying operations
have been ongoing since the early 1990’s. Prior to 1990 one could enjoy a
true clear blue sky, a figment of the past in 2011 – where none are to
be found.
Airship Proposed for Chemtrail Spraying
So just how deep does the geoengineering/terraforming rabbit hole go?
The Intel Hub
was able to obtain a copy of the final report prepared by the
University of Calgary under contract by Aurora Flight Sciences titled
“Geoengineering cost analysis.”
In the report there is smoking gun evidence of the
entire geoengineering saga from the secret bases, to the payload, to
what type of aircraft or “airship” will be the most cost effective to
spread toxic particulates throughout the earths atmosphere.
The final report also included budgets for different applications for aerosol dispersal within the atmosphere.
“Existing aircraft are evaluated based on cost of
acquisition and operations. An in-depth new aircraft design study and
cost analysis was conducted to determine the cost of developing and
operating a dedicated geoengineering airplane type. Similarly, an
airship design study and cost analysis was conducted. Finally a survey
of non-aircraft systems was conducted to determine how their costs
compare to aircraft and airships.
Yearly costs of 1M tonne geoengineering operations for all the
systems examined are presented in Figure 2. Some systems are easily
written off due to extremely high costs. Rocket based systems are not
cost competitive due to the large number of launches required and the
impact of occasional rocket failures on required fleet size. A system
based on 16Σ” naval Mark 7 guns was analyzed and compared to
previous work by the National Research Council.4 This system requires
large numbers of shots increasing projectile costs and driving yearly
costs over $100B. Gun costs become more competitive if the
projectile payload fraction can be increased from about 10% for a
standard shell to 50%. With this and a few improvements over the
1940-era Mark 7 gun yearly costs are still in the $20B range….The
primary vehicles examined to lift particulate to stratospheric altitudes
and disperse them at a predetermined release rate are airplanes and
airships; rockets and other non- aircraft methods such as guns
and suspended pipes are also surveyed.” –Aurora Flight Sciences: Geoengineering Final Report (p.5)
“Geoengineering may provide a means to create a time
buffer against catastrophic cli- mate change while long-term emissions
reduction actions take effect. One approach is to disperse sulfur
compounds at high altitude to reduce the effective solar flux entering
the atmosphere. This report will evaluate the means of delivering
sufficient mass of this or similar material to affect climate change on a
global scale. The goal of this study is to use engineering design and
cost analysis to determine the feasibility and cost of a delivering
material to the stratosphere for solar radiation management (SRM). This study does notexamine effectiveness or risks of injecting material into the stratosphere for SRM. Its goal is simply to compare a range of delivery systems on a single cost basis.” – Aurora Flight Sciences: Geoengineering Final Report (p.6)
Operational Costs – Not Including Payload
The report mentions how payload costs are not included in the estimate nor are the base/facility costs and continues on (p.8) to say;
“This study focuses on airplane and airship
operations to the stratosphere to release a geoengineering payload with
the goal of reducing incoming solar flux. Airships are also considered
for this mission. To provide a comparison to conventional aircraft
operations, more exotic concepts such as rockets, guns, and suspended
pipes are also examined….For maximum cooling impact, the particulate
payloads are best placed near the equator. This study assumes that the
payload is released within latitudes 30°N and 30°S, though North-South
basing location had minimal effect on cost. Transit operations, flying
East- West between equally spaced bases around the equator, were
examined as a method to ensure adequate dispersal of the payload around
the equator. Global winds aid in East-West dispersal so a smaller number
of bases and shorter range systems (referred to as Regional operations)
can be employed with minimal impact on dispersal. Region- al operations
allow the dispersal leg length to be dictated by the desired release
rate of 0.03kg/m flown. This means the airplanes fly no further than
they have to, on the order of 300-800 km, and fuel costs are minimized.”
– Aurora Flight Sciences: Geoengineering Final report Yearly cost
estimates from different dispersal methods ranged from over 1 billion
dollars a year all the way up to rocket dispersed aerosol in the upper
atmosphere at the cost of over 100 billion dollars per year.
GeoEngineering Research 2011
Today Americans would be outraged if U.N. troops entered Los
Angeles to restore order; tomorrow they will be grateful! This is
especially true if they were told there was an outside threat from
beyond whether real or promulgated, that threatened our very existence.
It is then that all peoples of the world will pledge with world leaders
to deliver them from this evil. The one thing every man fears is the
unknown. When presented with this scenario, individual rights will be
willingly relinquished for the guarantee of their well being granted to
them by their world government.” – Henry Kissinger in an address to the Bilderbergers at Evian, France, May 21, 1992.
Note: Websites/News Agencies are welcome to post 50% of this article linking back to us. Or contact us to post in full.
UPDATE – March 31st, 2011
• Aluminum resistant gene patent # 7582809
• Patent granted on September 1, 2009
• Patent developed at the Robert W. Holley Center for Agricultural Health at Cornell University in Ithaca, NY.
• Leon Kochian and Jurandir Vieira de Magallhaes are the primary inventors/ researchers
• Patent assigned to US Department of Agriculture and Brazilian Enterprise for Agricultural Research
• According to Cornell University Chronicle Online, the research
project was supported in part by the McKnight Foundation Collaborative
Crop Research Program, the Generation Challenge Program, the National
Science Foundation and the USDA.
The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation is a contributor to both the McKnight Foundation and the Generation Challenge Program.
http://www.mcknight.org/international/cropresearch.aspx
http://www.gatesfoundation.org/press-releases/Pages/molecular-breeding-platform-aims-to-enhance-plant-breeding-090901.aspx
Hundreds of Rain and Snow Tests HAVE BEEN DONE!
http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/htm/tests.html
Update 4/23/2011 – Amazing Chemtrail Pictures Taken In Phoenix Arizona
Taken 4/22/11 west of Phoenix, AZ suburbs.
From: Tim White
Subject: CHEMTRAILS-my phone call to PATRICK MINNIS of NASA
To: “Rosalind Peterson”
Received: Monday, July 27, 2009, 1:41 PM
I had the distinct DISpleasure of talking to this
NASA/CIA/NOAA/NCAR/EPA mouthpiece and fool Patrick Minnis back in May of
’99 when his name first started to come out as the debunker for us
CHEMTRAIL WHISTLEBLOWERS.He started to give me his standard bullshit
when I told him “STOP RIGHT THERE YOU LYING SACK OF SH%#@” ! I happen to
be ex Air Force,a Viet Nam Vet who is VERY familiar with aircraft and I
take extreme resentment of you not only lying to me but to all of your
victims who are clueless and also insulting my intelligence. Your
bulls%$# will NOT work on me so don’t continue. I will do my utmost to
expose you and this whole program for what it is. I know a lot more than
you realize so why don’t you jamb it and pass the message along to your
buddies at that other 3 letter agency at Langley across the way from
you”. His next question to me was “What group are you with”? I answer
“I’m not with any group. I’m independant of any group. Why do I have to
be in a group to have enough balls and initiative to call you as an
outraged individual,as a Concerned Citizen”? He responded,”Well,well,a
Conceerrned Citttizenn huh….hmmmm? You just don’t want to hear the facts
do you? All you conspiracy theorists are all alike-you are all
ignorant. Just run your mouths with no facts. I think you’re the
problem”. My response,”I sure hope that you’re proud of yourself and all
your Project Paperclip Nazi buddies should be too because this IS Nazis
at work so take your lies and shove them Minnis,I’m done with
you”!CLICK. Gee,that son of a bitch hung up on me! What cheek! I guess
he didn’t want to hear anymore,do ya suppose?
Tim White, Viet Nam Vet(USAF)
Concerned Citizen,Researcher,Investigator,Whistleblower
==========================================
NASA Confirms Weather-Shaping Chemtrails are Real-91 viewswww.mail.archive.com/WeatherShapingChemtrailsarereal
NASA: S-L-O-W To Spit Out The Truth
by Lisa Guliani
In the June 17, 2002 issue of the American Free Press newspaper, a
bold headline caught my attention: “NASA Confirms Weather-Shaping
Chemtrails”. What?? Could it be? Do I dare believe my eyes? NASA is
confirming that chemtrails are real? Naturally, I had to read this
article written by Mike Blair.
You betcha, the good ole boys at NASA are FINALLY admitting what many
of us already know and have been saying for quite some time – that
chemtrails are not only REAL, but are also wreaking their deleterious
effects on weather conditions. Well, whaddaya know? It must be a holiday
or something. Gee, maybe if they REALLY try, they will even come across
with the truth about HAARP someday in this lifetime. I can only dream.
If we assume the “glass-is-half-full” attitude, we might say that
this sloooow admission is “progress” since governmental agencies have
notoriously denied the existence of chemtrails despite Representative
Dennis Kucinich legitimizing them in House Resolution 2977 as a form of
“exotic weaponry” back in October, 2001. Sometimes I think if Jesus came
down off the cross and declared that chemtrails are real, there would
still be some moron to argue with Him about it. Duh.
The American Free Press article further states that NASA researchers
(in all their wisdom, I’m sure) have even “concluded that this POLLUTION
can create cirrus clouds.” Did you read that, folks? NASA called
chemtrails POLLUTION. Ahhh, maybe next time they’ll grow a ball and call
it just what it is – POISON. Moreover, NASA’s Langley Research Center
in Virginia went on to say that these artificially created cirrus clouds
“have an impact on climate because they spread over large areas and
effectively trap sunlight”. Woohoo!! NASA began this latest bit of
“research” after the events of 9/11/2001, so ten months of “study” and
NASA has managed to officially connect the first dot or two. Bravo,
fellas. It’s nice to see ya catching up with the rest of us – finally.
Blair’s article continues on to say NASA “came to its startling
conclusions while conducting research while all NON-MILITARY aircraft
were grounded” in the initial days following the events of September
11th. First of all, “startling conclusions?” Why is NASA startled at
all? NASA has known about chemtrails all along. After all, isn’t it NASA
that obtained and holds the U.S. patent numbered 3813875? Why, YES, it
is!!! Gee, maybe they forgot or something, ya think? They procured this
patent in 1974. It is linked with a program that utilizes BARIUM for the
purpose of creating ion clouds in our atmosphere. Fancy that. But NASA
is “startled” to conclude that chemtrails are affecting our climate, eh?
According to AFP, Patrick Minnis, a senior researcher at Langley,
stated that the man-made “cirrus clouds are already having an impact on
climate, increasing temperatures on regional levels as much as two to
five percent.” Hmmm … I wonder how long it will take my chemtrail
debunker knuckledraggers to smear and eat their own? Think they’ll be
calling Minnis a kooky conspiracy theorist anytime soon? We’ll see,
won’t we?
