THE POSTS MOSTLY BY GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION

THE POSTS MOSTLY BY GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION

THE POSTS MOSTLY BY GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION

.

.
Boston artist Steve Mills - realistic painting
Showing posts with label GREECE. Show all posts
Showing posts with label GREECE. Show all posts

Friday, June 24, 2011

The Financial Collapse Of Greece-The Canary In The Coal Mine For The Global Economy?

The Financial Collapse Of Greece-The Canary In The Coal Mine For The Global Economy?


The rest of the world needs to sit up and take notice of what is going on in Greece right now.  This is what can happen when you allow government debt to spiral out of control.  Once it becomes clear that you can't pay your debts, a financial collapse can happen very suddenly and you start losing your sovereignty to those that you must turn to for financial help.  So is the financial collapse of Greece the "canary in the coal mine"* for the global economy?  EU finance ministers have given the Greek government two weeks from Monday to approve another round of brutal austerity measures.  If the austerity measures are not approved, Greece will not receive the next bailout installment of 12 billion euros.  If that happens, the whole globe better buckle up because it is going to get crazy.
July 3rd is the deadline.  Basically the EU has put a gun to the head of the Greek government.  Without this bailout money, Greece will default and economic hell will break loose all across the country.
It is important to keep in mind that this is just the first Greek bailout that we are talking about.  Last year, the EU and the IMF agreed to provide the Greek government with a 110 billion euro bailout. The current 12 billion euro installment is part of that package.
Sadly, it has become apparent that the first bailout is not going to be nearly enough for Greece.  A second bailout, which will be the same size or even larger, is already being discussed.  This is going to put the Greek people even more under the heel of the money powers in Europe.
Keep in mind that all of these "bailouts" are just more loans.  There is no way that the Greeks are ever going to be able to repay all of this money.
But this is what happens when a nation lets debt get out of control.  For years and years it can seem like all of that debt does not have any consequences, but then the day of reckoning comes and it is a complete and total nightmare.
In order to get the next installment of 12 billion euros, European finance ministers are insisting that the Greek Parliament approves a package of austerity measures that will be worth approximately 28 billion euros.
At this point, it is uncertain whether those austerity measures will pass.
However, the pressure on the Greek government to get them pushed through is immense.
These austerity measures include tax increases, budget cuts and a "large-scale privatization program".
This is often what happens to third world nations that cannot pay their debts.  Organizations such as the IMF or the World Bank will come in and insist that they tax their people more, cut back on their spending and sell some of their public assets to big corporations.
As we can see from the wild protests that have been taking place in Greece, a significant percentage of the Greek population is not happy with all of these austerity measures.
Unfortunately, the EU and the IMF are able to put a lot more pressure on the Greek government than the Greek people are.
Greek Prime Minister George Papandreou recently gave the following warning to the Greek people about what could happen if this debt crisis ends badly....
The consequences of a violent bankruptcy or exit from the euro would be immediately catastrophic for households, the banks, and the country's credibility.
Not only would a Greek default be a total disaster for Greece, it would potentially be a total disaster for the entire global financial system.
Sung Won Sohn, an economics professor at California State University, recently made the following statement about the seriousness of the debt crisis in Europe....
"The European debt crisis has the potential to have as big an impact as the subprime mortgage crisis did in the United States"
So will these bailouts solve the problem?
No, giving Greece more loans is only going to kick the can down the road for a little while longer.
The truth is that Greece is bankrupt.  Unless huge amounts of Greek debt are forgiven, Greece is going to default sooner or later.
When confidence in the finances of a nation is lost, borrowing costs can go up very quickly.  Today, the yield on two year Greek bonds is up to 28.6%.
Anyone that has ever been late on paying their credit cards knows how painful an interest rate like that can be.
So why doesn't Greece just slash government spending to the bone and get their financial house in order?
Well, it is not that easy.  Harsh austerity measures have already been implemented.  As a result, unemployment is rampant and there is rioting in the streets.
The truth is that, as an article in The Guardian recently explained, austerity has taken a brutal toll on the Greek economy....
A year of wage and pension cuts, benefit losses and tax increases has taken its toll: almost a quarter of the population now live below the poverty line, unemployment is at a record 16% and, as the economy contracts for a third year, economists estimate that about 100,000 businesses have closed.
As the economy crumbles, Greece has descended into an almost permanent state of civil unrest.
The fact that the EU and the IMF want even more austerity measures has sparked some wild rioting In Greece in recent days.  You can see video of the stunning violence going on in Greece right here.
Not all protesters are being violent.  Some of them are showing their displeasure in non-violent ways.  For example, workers for Greece's state-owned electric utility are staging 48 hours of rolling strikes that are designed to create blackouts over large areas.
The frightening thing is that Greece is not alone.  Ireland has already received a bailout and they are probably going to need another one at some point.
Portugal is a financial basket case and they are probably next in line for a bailout.
The employment situation in Spain is absolutely nightmarish.  Spain will probably be able to squeak by without a bailout if the global economy stays stable, but if the dominoes start to fall Spain could be in a massive amount of trouble very quickly.
Not that many people are talking about Italy, but the truth is that Italy has a huge debt problem.  On Friday, Moody's warned that it may downgrade Italy's Aa2 debt rating at some point within the next 90 days.
Belgium and France also have very substantial debt problems.  They probably would not be the first dominoes to fall, but if the "contagion" starts to spread they could certainly have massive problems.
The truth is that Europe's entire financial system is extremely vulnerable right now.  Big banks all over Europe (and especially in Germany) are leveraged to the hilt.  All it would take to topple many of them is a stiff breeze.
When Lehman Brothers collapsed, it was leveraged 31 to 1.
Today, German banks are leveraged 32 to 1.
German banks are also holding a massive amount of Greek debt.
That is why there is so much fear that the crisis in Greece could spread across the rest of Europe and start toppling dominoes.
The sovereign debt crisis in Europe did not happen overnight and it is going to be with us for a long, long time even if the global economy remains relatively stable.
At the moment, the best that officials in Europe can seem to come up with is to put off the pain for another day.  Pimco's Mohamed El-Erian told CNBC the following on Monday....
"This problem is not going to go away. It's going to weigh on markets here and we're going to see the same set of headlines over and over again. We simply cannot continue to kick the can down the road, because we're coming to the end of the road in Greece."
So if Europe starts having major problems will the U.S. step in and help?
Yes, if the crisis in Europe gets worse, the Federal Reserve will probably step in just like they did back in 2008.
But the U.S. is rapidly approaching a day of reckoning like the one that Greece is going through.  The U.S. government has piled up the biggest mountain of debt in the history of the world and faith in the U.S. dollar is dying.
The economic crisis in the United States gets worse with each passing year.  Yes, the Federal Reserve can print up stacks of money and send it over to Europe, but that isn't going to solve anything in the long run.  The truth is that the U.S. is not even going to be able to keep itself from drowning.
The world financial system is far more vulnerable today than it was back in 2008.  The next wave of the financial collapse is going to hit at some point, and when it does it is going to probably be even more painful than the last wave.
Our world is becoming an incredibly unstable place.
--------------
*
Life for an actual canary in a coal mine could be described in three words: short but meaningful. Early coal mines did not feature ventilation systems, so miners would routinely bring a caged canary into new coal seams. Canaries are especially sensitive to methane and carbon monoxide, which made them ideal for detecting any dangerous gas build-ups. As long as the bird kept singing, the miners knew their air supply was safe. A dead canary signaled an immediate evacuation.
Even as gas detection technology improved, some mining companies still relied on the "canary in a coal mine" method well into the 20th century. Other animals were used occasionally, but only the canary had the ability to detect small concentrations of gas and react instinctively.
Today, the practice of using a bird to test the air supply has become part of coal mining lore, but the ideology behind it has become a popular expression. The phrase living like a canary in a coal mine often refers to serving as a warning to others. The actual canary had little control over its fate, but it continued to sing anyway. In one sense, living this way indicates a willingness to experience life's dangers without compromise.
In another sense, many business and political analysts use the term canary in a coal mine to describe a harbinger of the future. A melting glacier in Alaska, for example, may be described as a canary in a coal mine for global warming. One small event in an isolated area may not seem especially noteworthy, but it may offer the first tangible warning of a larger problem developing. In a political sense, a country's delegation abruptly leaving a meeting could be described as a canary in a coal mine for future negotiations.
Some large corporations also use a "canary in a coal mine" strategy for future growth or reduction. A small company may be used to test the waters for a new product line, for instance. Even if the company only experiences modest profits or losses, the parent corporation can evaluate the feasibility of the product without risking a large investment. By carefully observing any early indicators, industries can avoid major failures down the road or benefit from a jump on the competition.

Tuesday, June 8, 2010

Ron Paul:Why Governments Hate Gold


Date: 06/07/2010
Why Governments Hate Gold
This past week several emerging and ongoing crises took attention away from the ongoing sovereign debt problems in Greece. The bailouts are merely kicking the can down the road and making things worse for taxpaying citizens, here and abroad. Greece is unfortunately not unique in its irresponsible spending habits. Greek-style debt explosions are quickly spreading to other nations one by one, and yes, the United States is one of the dominoes on down the line.
Time and again it has been proven that the Keynesian system of big government and fiat paper money are abject failures in the long run. However, the nature of government is to ignore reality when there is an avenue that allows growth in power and control. Thus, most politicians and economists will ignore the long-term damage of Keynesianism in the early stage of a bubble when there is the illusion of prosperity, suggesting that the basic laws of economics had been repealed. In fact, one way to tell if a bubble is about to burst is if economists start talking about how the government and the Central Bank have repealed the business cycle.
The truth is the laws of economics are constant and real, no matter how inconvenient they might be to politicians and bankers. This reality is setting in and the bills are coming due. In the mean time, countries that have no money have bailed out other countries that have no money, except for the phony money created by politicians, bureaucrats, and their partners-in-crime at the central banks. This may be preventing big well-connected banks from having to take on massive losses, but it is all at the expense of the taxpaying citizen.
As governments and central banks continue the cycle of spending and inflating, the purchasing power of their currencies is constantly being degraded. These currencies are what the people are working for and saving. This inflation guts the savings and earnings of the people, who have very limited options for protecting themselves against these ravages. One option is to convert their fiat currency into something out of reach of central banks and government spending, such as gold or silver.
It is fairly typical in the midst of economic crises like these for gold to come under attack from Keynesians economists and their amen corner in the media. The arguments against gold are usually straw men, based on a fundamental misunderstanding of the purpose of buying gold. Gold is not a typical investment. It is a defense against the predictable behavior of governments to debase a fiat currency under its absolute control. The people who run the printing presses have trouble shutting them off. In order to limit one’s exposure to this reckless behavior, it is wise to exchange unsound assets for sound ones.
As the foundation of their power, their fiat currency, is rejected or avoided, government power is compromised. Fiat currencies trade the people’s freedom and security for the government’s freedom to squander the wealth of the nation on wasteful pet programs, wars, and corruption. This is why the freedom of the people is so intertwined with a sound monetary unit. This is also why the founders liked gold and silver, and supporters of big government hate them.

Tuesday, May 18, 2010

P. Krugman-Ignoring The Elephant In the Euro


Paul Krugman - New York Times Blog

May 17, 2010, 9:42 AM

Et Tu, Wolfgang?

Perhaps the most startling and frustrating thing about the debate over the fate of the euro is the way almost everyone avoids confronting the core issue — the elephant in the euro. With a unified currency, adjustment to differential shocks requires adjustments in relative wages — and because the nations of the European periphery have gone from boom to bust, their adjustment must be downward. At this point, wages in Greece/Spain/Portugal/Latvia/Estonia etc. need to fall something like 20-30 percent relative to wages in Germany. Let me repeat that:
WAGES IN THE PERIPHERY NEED TO FALL 20-30 PERCENT RELATIVE TO GERMANY.
But nobody is willing to say that outright. Even the ever-pessimistic (and hence realistic) Wolfgang Munchau writes
None of the governance reform proposals that are currently discussed even attempt to answer the questions of how Spain is going to get out of this hole, and how the competitiveness gap between the north and the south of the eurozone is going to be closed … What the eurozone needs is an increase in domestic consumption in the north, particularly in Germany, and labour and product market reforms in the south, most importantly in Spain.
How many readers will get that what he’s really saying is that
WAGES IN THE PERIPHERY NEED TO FALL 20-30 PERCENT RELATIVE TO GERMANY.
How hard will it be to achieve this? Look at Latvia, which has pursued incredibly draconian austerity. Unemployment has risen from 6 percent before the crisis to 22.3 percent now — and wages are, indeed, falling. But even in Latvia labor costs have fallen only 5.4 percent from their peak; so it will take years of suffering to restore competitiveness.
The official answer is that this just shows the need for more flexible labor markets. But this was a subject we all batted back and forth in the initial debate about the euro, circa 1990: nobody has labor markets that flexible.
 If the euro isn’t workable without highly flexible nominal wages, well, it isn’t workable.
Anyway, this is my morning euro rant.

May 15, 2010, 8:49 AM

Ignoring The Elephant In the Euro

When the idea of the euro was first broached, there was extensive debate about whether Europe constituted an “optimum currency area”; the key question was whether European nations would have an adequate way to adjust to “asymmetric shocks”, which left some economies more depressed than others. When countries have their own currencies, they can deal with such shocks, at least in part, by devaluing — an argument made most eloquently by none other than Milton Friedman (pdf). Lacking that alternative, something else is needed.
So now we have a euro crisis, which — to me at least — hinges crucially on that very issue. What makes Greek problems so intractable is the fact that there’s little hope for growth for years to come, because Greek costs and prices are out of line and will need years of painful deflation to get back in line. Spain wouldn’t be in trouble at all if it weren’t for the fact that the bubble years left its costs too high, again requiring years of painful deflation.
Yet if you look at many discussions of the euro crisis, they simply ignore the adjustment issue. Not to especially bash Marco Pagano, but how can you write a whole essay on the euro’s troubles without so much as mentioning the problem of getting relative costs and prices in line?
It’s tempting to psychoanalyze here — to note that if you pretend that it’s all about fiscal profligacy, the problem seems solvable with a bit more discipline, but if you admit that the original optimum currency area issues are key to the situation, you wonder whether the common currency really makes sense.
But whatever the reason, it’s stunning to see so many smart people pretending not to notice the elephant in the room.
http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/05/15/ignoring-the-elephant-in-the-euro/

Get Plucked: Bail Out Greece

logo
Published on The Brussels Journal (http://www.brusselsjournal.com)

Get Plucked: Bail Out Greece

Created 2010-05-07 11:04

The € is heading south and all will have their feathers plucked. Pursued illusions are not at the end of a free ride.

1.The economic ignorance that, fortunately for certain groups, prevails even among the educated, cannot save Greece or a titillating “who is next” from the quickly changing headlines. Here again, we have a generally ignored country propelled to the top of the totem pole of attention. Although one likes to talk about Athens, this economic earthquake might only prove to be the beginning of the parade to follow. Several countries, all with failing public finances that hope to remain undiscovered, are lurking in the shadow cast by the spot lights that are now focused on the Greeks.
2. It might in the near future be a subject of astonishment that the focus is directed to the specific case of Greece. Thereby, the timely discussion of an entire category of comparable cases that are about to unfold, is down played. Some proposed solutions to save Greece are, due to this blending out, spared full scrutiny and, possibly, dismissal as unworkable. The point is that bailing our Athens might be makeable since it only represents 2% of the EU’s economy. However, this approach should not be scrutinized as an oddity, but as the first visible wreck of a highway chain collision that is still hidden by thick fog. In this case, the solution pales in the light of the total calamity. The piled up wreckage beyond the Greek horizon includes the crushed mass of Portugal, Spain, and there are further wrecks in the making.

3. A consideration that all will understand blunts the proposed bailout’s Wunderwaffe. The analogy is found in the national context. It pertains to the inability to extend welfare to all those that decide to demand it. Welfare as a solution works as long as a mass is asked to support a few unfortunates. On that basis, welfare can perform as intended and is part of a potential solution. At the same time, not even the most correctly thinking governing party can raise the standard of living of its people by fashionably extending aid to everybody. Such cases created by national governments are piling up. These have been trusting that the EU can enable their voters to live above their means.  If the wreckages are added up, the resulting need to “rescue” all seems impossible. The total effect of misguided national policies are about to end in a demonstration of welfareism’s limitations. The reaction of collapsing stock markets to the news about the settlement confirms the allegation.

4. Even in public, albeit not from official sources, one hears that Greece should not have been accepted to the €-club. This sounds like “the rain is over, I can open my dry umbrella,” unless we include the comparable precipitation of the cases still in the pipeline. In part, however, the problem has not only been that the club had ignored its own criteria for entry and also Athens’s manipulation of its data that seemed to have the blessing of eurocracy. After her membership, Greece and others operate(d) like a badly run boarding school. “Do what you want, just do not force us to notice it” appears to have been the operating principle. Greece’s is the first of the balloons to burst. However, she is not the only case that involves a practice that allows the violation of EU rules while extending the advantages of membership. Accordingly, any future rescue deal in exchange for reforms might, when applied, follow the pattern of “do what you wish just do not make us notice”. Whatever rationalization is agreed upon does not guarantee that it can be implemented or that there is an intention to do so fully. The explanation lies in a tradition of slippery governance and in the natural resistance of a society addicted to something for nothing. Meanwhile, one can commiserate the private investors that have, trusting EU controls, sunk their savings into Greek – and comparable – government bonds.

5. The original spin put on the rescue package had been rather transparent. Allegedly, Europe was not propping up Greece by gifts. The association’s statutes forbade that. So a back-yard entrance was found through the participation of the IMF. Not the €-zone alone gave but also the IMF. Early on, the market demanded about 7% interest for lenders. Athens is to get money for 5%. With this, Brussels-Europe formally respects its own proscription of subventions. In case you accept that this credit is not a support payment then hardly anything will fulfill the criterion.  Meanwhile, skeptics will have reason to conclude that, as in other cases, the EU does not stick to its own rules. As this is written, the free market that uses its own money – unlike governments that spend yours – expects compensation for growing risks. That pushes the going rate to around 20%.

6. How could Greece fall into this ditch? The matter is of note as the story transcends any country’s importance: comparable cases are waiting behind the corner to be outed. Mosaic pieces that fit into other pictures, are numerous. They suggest that Greece is not the victim of the unforeseeable anger of her many conspiring Gods. The trap is man-made. As such, it reflects an ideology that is rooted in a voodoo perspective of economics and reflects a potty view of reality.
Here a sample of policies that led to the crash. After fifteen years of contribution, a person could retire at 110% of his salary. Retirement was possible at the youthful age of fifty. The unmarried or divorced daughters of deceased public servants received a pension. Salaries were paid for a fourteen-month year. Civil servants had protected jobs and at least one person out of four had such coveted status. These people received significant bonuses. Such as for the ability to use a computer, or for the command of a foreign language. The writer’s favorite is a bonus for appearing at work on time. Bloated bureaucracy shows ingenuity to keep people on the payroll. The best job was on a commission that administered a lake that dried out in the 1930s.
Typically, state-jobs did more than to keep folks with connections employed. Jobs without functions do more than to cause unnecessary expenditures. Threading bureaucratic water makes out of a useless person a hindrance for those that would produce if only the regulations to keep the controllers busy would let them. A rating reveals the practical result of this. A study estimating bureaucratic hindrances on enterpise rated Greece to be the 109th of the world. Just behind Ethiopia. Small wonder that the black economy’s share of the GDP is estimated to hover around 28%. Let me drop the issue by noting that these tidbits might be extreme without being unique. Therefore, there is a reservoir of hemorrhaging patients crowding the emergency room.

7. Greece’s acknowledged debt is 113 % of GDP. One wonders, will she be able to pay installments that are due: does she wish to do so? At any rate, projected repayment assumes a churning economy. The correction will let the air out of Greece’s tires. When Athens joined, out of courtesy, it got a high Drachma-€ rate. Thus, the Greeks could buy cheap but produced dear. Thereafter, the strong unions that now protect their sinecures by rioting, prevented realistic income adjustments. Local spenders and their foreign creditors believed the fallacy that no €-land will be dropped. Others trusted the EU’s controls. Comparable credulity prevents people from discovering that not 110 billion € but that more than 300 billion might be needed. Now, with others skirting trouble, there is not enough help to go around. The case hide sunpleasant facts. One is that the truth under the fantasy-laden statistics has been no secret. Even worse is that Greece is not the only country that wraps reality in falsified statistics. Greece’s entrance into the €-zone was known to be based on economic data inspired by courteously wishful thinking. Therefore, the surprise now appears to be artificial. Knowingly, EU countries have let cosmetically improved presentations to stand. Not only in the case of Greece! This points to problems embedded in the €. Not having a state to protect it, the artificial “money” of incompatibly diverse constituents lures leeches. They exploit suckers that are unaware of risks of their government’s participation. As things stand, Athens will be funded with a sum that is 32 times its quota of the fund foreseen for temporary problems of solvency. This for a collateral expressed in sovereign debt certificates that are, in terms of EU rules, worthless. Essentially the € exists because the Germans pay and the others get. What wisdom this attests to the countries that refused the join the € -Zone!

8. Duly, the crisis has provoked a question by those who look beyond the moment. Have we, are we learning from the predicament? To the extent that we fail to admit that the (global) crisis’ cause is a political intervention (loans to those who could not repay them) we will miss the proper conclusions. The argument runs like this. To begin with, politics had a market distorting input. Then the crisis matured. From an American housing-credit crisis, it muted into a general infection of the economy that paralyzed entire industries and even countries that are remote from the original epicenter. Government intervention saved the global economy from default. Nevertheless, the lesson is that state intervention is dangerous, as governments do not seek economic returns but aim at electoral returns.

9. The Greek debt and the insolvency of discredited sovereign borrowers do not demand an invention as a remedy for after the plague. Wanted is action prior to the infection. It is as in the case with US – and European – immigration. The talk about new laws serves to postpone action. Meanwhile, the fitting response is available. Just apply existing regulations. The contemporary state that bows to every interest group and, in doing so, violates its own rules, must be reminded to enforce its own existing decrees.