Boston artist Steve Mills - realistic painting

Monday, May 24, 2010

The Fraudulent War on Terror

The Fraudulent War on Terror

Why Are We Unable to Resist?

Updated: October 20, 2009

I often wonder why young Americans do nothing to protest the outrageous criminal regime that has taken control of the United States.  Where is the resistance?  Two illegal wars, a growing police state, and several trillion dollars stolen by criminal bankers from the American people in the past year alone -- why aren't they protesting, resisting - burning tires in the streets?

Why are Americans unable to protest against the criminal regime that has taken over their nation?  Here French farmers protest low grain prices in Paris on October 16, 2009.  Why don't we see such protests against the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, or against the trillion dollar rip-off for the big bankers?  Why is the resistance in the U.S. completely unorganized?
Having grown up during the Vietnam War, I was immersed in the protest movement and vibrant anti-war music and culture of the 1960s.  "Lucky Man" by Emerson, Lake, and Palmer is a good example of the anti-war music of the time.  I find it odd that there is no similar anti-war movement or music today.  Faced with never-ending wars in the Middle East, today's youth seem completely apathetic and apolitical.
During the years that I attended public school, the United States was engaged in an undeclared war of aggression in Southeast Asia that nobody really understood.  Every week, the American people saw actual photos from the war in LIFE magazine and could easily see through the deception that we were fighting "communism".   After 8 years of war in Afghanistan and 18 years in Iraq, however, there is no similar photo-journalism of comparable quality coming from the "embedded" journalists covering these wars.  Likewise, there is virtually no anti-war music or protest movement against the criminal wars being fought in our name.   Why?
We have to look at the media to understand the lack of a similar anti-war movement in the United States.  Today, there is no mass resistance because the U.S. media is now completely owned and controlled by Zionist Jews who actually support the fraudulent "War on Terror" and the illegal wars being fought by the United States and its allies.  These wars are being waged to benefit Israel and strengthen the Zionist hegemony in the Middle East and Central Asia.  The Zionist-controlled mass media in the United States now works full time to promote the war agenda - first Afghanistan, then Iraq, and now Iran.  In the Zionist-controlled media there is no room for any real criticism of the Zionist war agenda.
Paul Wolfowitz, one of the senior U.S. officials who conspired and planned the wars of aggression against both Afghanistan and Iraq, is now pushing for war against Iran in the pages of the Financial Times(U.K.), for example.  It needs to be understood that Wolfowitz is guilty of the most serious war crime, "a crime against peace" as defined by the Nuremberg Principles.  That his opinion is published in a leading financial paper illustrates my point that the mass media actively promotes the Zionist war agenda.  Wolfowitz has strong connections to the state of Israel.  He lived in Israel as a teenager when his Polish-born father, Jacob, worked at the Technion, and his sister, Laura, married an Israeli and lives in Jerusalem.
The controlled media today censors and sanitizes the images and information about the wars and the human suffering the aggression has caused to the people of Iraq and Afghanistan.  The public is kept in the dark about the true costs of the illegal wars, both human and financial.  Most importantly, the U.S. media keeps powerful images like these from the Vietnam and Iraq wars off the pages of our newspapers.

The famous photo of Vietnamese children burned with napalm changed U.S. public opinion about the war.

The photo of a summary execution by a South Vietnamese police chief showed the lawlessness of the war.

The U.S. evacuates after the fall of Saigon
After nearly 19 years of fighting and bombing Iraqis, very few images of the human cost of the war have been published.  The ones that have been seen are horrible beyond belief and reveal the criminal nature of the war of aggression.

A photo from the "Highway of Death" shows what happened to one of the thousands of retreating Iraqis who were incinerated by a U.S. gas-air MOAB (Mother of All Bombs) in 1991.

A U.S. Marine killing injured Iraqis in a mosque in Fallujah, November 13, 2004 (NBC/AP)
The Vietnam war was being fought, we were told, to keep Southeast Asia from falling to the communists.  Thousands of young men, including several of my relatives, went to Vietnam to fight "communism".  Many thousands of young Americans died in Viet Nam.  An untold number of Vietnamese died.

Vietnam eventually did fall to the communists and the last U.S. personnel had to flee from the roof of the embassy in Saigon with desperate people being pushed off the over-crowded helicopters.  Despite the fact that the U.S. lost the war in Vietnam, the world did not come to an end.  As a matter of fact, nobody even seemed to notice.  Most people were simply glad the 12-year old war was over.

I have often wondered why today's youth seem utterly unable to resist the blatant lies of the criminal government and controlled media, which are clearly extremely harmful to them and their nation.  I can't understand why the young people in America and Europe abuse themselves with tattoos and body piercings.  Don't they care about themselves?  I have seen people with screws coming through their eyebrows that look like construction accidents that should be sent to the nearest emergency room. 

Christopher J. 
Petherick, the former chief editor of the Spotlight andAmerican Free Press, a weekly newspaper I wrote for in Washington, D.C., had an ugly metal stud sticking through his tongue that looked absolutely awful.  I had never seen such a thing.  He told me that he was a Satanist.  I thought he was just an East Coast trendie.  I sometimes told him that we were doing the Lord's work by spreading the Truth.  

Christopher J. Petherick, a self-avowed Satanist, was the editor ofAmerican Free Press and the former Spotlight, publications of the Liberty Lobby of Washington, D.C.  It makes no sense that a Satanist would be the chief editor of a newspaper that is purportedly written for patriotic Christian Americans, unless one understands that the Liberty Lobby is actually owned and controlled by a Zionist Jew named Mark Lane.  The paper is a controlled opposition outlet that acts like flypaper to create a list of active patriots -- for the Jewish intelligence organization Lane works for.
Petherick fired me after a three-man team of heavily-armed undercover police broke my arm and TASERed me in front of my family, but only after collecting many thousands of dollars from readers for the Bollyn "legal defense fund," which were kept by the so-called employee owned newspaper.  I later discovered that the newspaper and the organization behind it, the Liberty Lobby, are actually owned by the Jewish leftist lawyer, Mark Lane, and have been since the early 1990s when he bought the assets of Liberty Lobby with some of the $5 million he had been paid by Willis A. Carto in legal fees.
I learned this from L.T. Patterson, publisher of Criminal Politics of Cincinnati.  Patterson's newsletter is similar to the publications of the Mark Lane's Liberty Lobby, which is what led Lane to sue Patterson in the mid-1990s for some $10 million.  Lane, a Zionist Jew, wanted to have a monopoly in the patriotic newspaper business.  During the legal process Patterson learned that Lane had acquired the assets of the nearly bankrupt Liberty Lobby in the early 1990s.  Manfred Roeder, a German patriot who has been imprisoned often in occupied Germany, told me that such controlled opposition newspapers likeNational Zeitung are designed to skim the cream off of the nationalist movement.  They also serve as outlets of disinformation and have even more sinister purposes.

Jane Fonda and Mark Lane worked closely together in the anti-war movement during the Vietnam War.  Lane, who served in U.S. Army intelligence in post-war Germany, owns the assets of Liberty Lobby and American Free Press.
As the U.S. prepared for war in Kuwait and Iraq in the summer of 1990, I began organizing pro-Palestinian students at the University of California at Santa Cruz who were opposed to the war effort.  I learned a great deal through my anti-war efforts.  I saw how the anti-war movement was taken over by Jewish students from the Hillel organization (B'nai B'rith).  The issue of occupied Palestine was pushed to the side.  This is what controlled opposition means:  controlling both sides of the debate to control the message.
James B. Phillips, a devout Catholic and dear friend from Chicago who served in Vietnam, recently sent me a video from the mid-1980s that explains how Americans have been demoralized and why. 

James B. Phillips, (top row, 3rd from left) commanded a U.S. rifle platoon in Viet Nam. 
The information comes from a former agent of the Soviet K.G.B. who defected to the United States.

The former K.G.B. agents says:  "Exposure to true information does not matter anymore.  A person who was demoralized is unable to assess true information.  The facts tell nothing to him."

This is exactly the problem we face in 2009.  Although Americans have the information that proves that their government has not been elected and is lying to them about 9-11 and everything else, the people do nothing to resist.  They have become enslaved to lies.  This video explains how this was done.
As the former Soviet journalist Yuri Bezmenov says in the video clip about the KGB's demoralization of American youth through the media, "Ideological subversion is the process which is legitimate and open. You can see it with your own eyes.... It has nothing to do with espionage... in reality the main emphasis of the KGB is NOT in the area of intelligence at all. According to my opinion, and the opinions of many defectors of my caliber, only about 15% of time, money, and manpower is spent on espionage as such. The other 85 percent is a slow process which we call either ideological subversion, active measures, or psychological warfare. What it basically means is to change the perception of reality of every American [so] that despite the abundance of information no one is able to come to sensible conclusions in the interest of defending themselves, their families, their community, and their country."
Today, nearly every network and news outlet in the U.S. mass media is owned and controlled by Zionist Jews.  This is a statement of fact and should not be misconstrued to be anti-Semitic in any way.  Zionist Jews control nearly all of the U.S. mass media: television and radio networks, major newspapers, book publishers and leading book stores, and the big film studios and chains of movie theatres.  They have taken control of the media for one reason - to manipulate public opinion by controlling the message.  It is the same with media as with pipelines:  He who owns the pipeline controls the product.  
Many of the Jewish media moguls are members of the secret organization of Freemasons, the International Order of B'nai B'rith.  Philip Morris Klutznick, the man who made Obama president, was the international president of B'nai B'rith.  The Sulzberger family who owns the New York Times was one of the founding families of Lodge No. 1 of the B'nai B'rith, which was started in New York City in 1843.  It is through this secret society, which is closed to all non-Jews, that the media moguls and Jewish financiers are able to conspire against the American people while living among them. 
The B'nai B'rith also started the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) in the early 1900s.  The ADL is an organization that protects the Jewish criminal network by attacking those who expose their crimes.  The ADL has infiltrated police departments across the United States.  The B'nai B'rith also runs Hillel, an organization for promoting the Zionist agenda at every college campus in the United States.  Through their organizations like the ADL and Hillel, the secretive Elders of Zion of the B'nai B'rith are able to push their agenda into every community and college campus in America.  The Protocols of the Elders of Zion is certainly not a "hoary fake", and is most likely the protocols from a meeting of the leaders of the B'nai B'rith. 
Bezmenov's statement about the KGB being primarily occupied with disinformation and demoralization efforts aimed at Americans through the media is similar to the analysis by the German intelligence expert, Andreas von Bülow, who told me that 90 percent of the work done by the CIA and other intelligence agencies is disinformation and deception. 
It needs to be understood that communism and Zionism are fraternal twins from the same mother -- big Jewish capital of the Rothschild sort.  This relationship can be seen in Rahm Emanuel and David Axelrod, the most senior advisers of President Barack Hussein Obama II.  Emanuel, the son of a Zionist terrorist, and Axelrod, the son of Jewish communists, were commissioned in 1992 by the daughter of Jewish financier Philip Morris Klutznick of Chicago to make Obama our "first black president."  Zionism and communism are two heads of the same evil beast.
Communism and Zionism emerged together in the Russian Empire in the late 1800s.  There were six communist parties, two of which were also Zionist.  Although the Rothschild family who created the state of Israel is capitalist, the Russian Jews who emigrated to Palestine in the late 1800s and early 1900s were ardent communists and socialists.  Most of the Ashkenazi (Khazar and Slavic) Jews who built the Zionist state and who run it to this day come from the communist and Zionist parties that created the kibbutz and moshav settlements in Palestine.  The Jews who were forced to emigrate to Palestine (later Israel) and the millions of people who have lived under communism are similar.  Zionists and communists are both merely the pawns of the Rothschilds; foot soldiers for international Jewish bankers.
Originally posted on September 30, 2009

The Christmas Bomber and the Fraudulent War on Terror

January 11, 2010
"Let's be clear about what this moment demands.  We are at war.  We are at war against Al Qaida."
- President Barack Obama, 7 January 2010 

For the people on the ground in Pakistan and elsewhere, Obama's "War on Terror" means only more U.S. aggression and terrorism - against them and their families.  Hundreds of innocent civilians have already been killed by Hellfire missiles fired by C.I.A. operated drones.  Is this not state-sponsored terrorism?
The Christmas Bomber and the Fraudulent War on Terror
by Christopher Bollyn
 In Washington, President Obama is under pressure to take action. The Christmas Day attempted attack over Detroit may have failed, but it brought back instant memories of 9/11. Military action will continue.
- Jeremy Bowen, BBC Middle East Editor, 5 January 2010
On 18 November 2009 I published a warning in which I said there was a "very high" risk of a false-flag "Al Qaida" terror attack against Americans.  The warning was the thrust of my article, entitled “Terror Risk High as Obama Ponders Afghan Fiasco,” which begins with this sentence:  "The risk of another false-flag terror attack like the terror atrocities of 9-11 is currently very high."  (A "false-flag" terror incident is one that is designed to affect public opinion by being blamed on a third party by the real perpetrators.)  On Christmas Day, thirty-seven days after my article was published on, the false-flag terror incident I predicted occurred on a passenger airliner approaching Detroit's Metro Airport.

The "attempted" bombing on Christmas Day was designed to garner support for President Obama's actions in support of the Zionist fraud known as the "War on Terror".
My November 18 warning of a false-flag terror attack was the first I have ever issued based on my own understanding of the political situation at hand.  I decided to publish the warning because I was absolutely convinced that the Zionist planners behind the fraudulent "War on Terror" desperately needed a high-profile terrorist incident involving Americans to gain public and political support to legitimize the actions the Obama administration has taken to advance the Zionist war on Islam.  As President Barack Obama called for a massive troop surge in Afghanistan there was clearly an urgent need to validate his ill-advised policies to increase U.S. force levels in the disastrous and costly eight-year-old war - a war of aggression which lacks any validity.  Since terrorism is the primary tool and tactic in the Zionist construct known as the "War on Terror" it seemed quite logical that a false-flag terror event involving "al Qaida" was imminent, so I published the warning.    

To be successful, a false-flag terror attack has to attract a huge amount of attention around the world and be immediately
interpreted by the mass media in such a way to sway public opinion in the direction desired by the terror planners.  The propaganda value of a false-flag terror attack is the real reason behind the architectural planning of such an event.  This is the main difference between the two major attacks that occurred during the Christmas holiday period.  The suicide bombing on December 30 of the C.I.A.'s Forward Operating Base Chapman in Khost, Afghanistan, in which seven high-level U.S. intelligence officers and a spy chief from the Kingdom of Jordan were killed was obviously more lethal, but it was not a false-flag terror attack and has no propaganda value, quite the contrary, it revealed that the King of Jordan is an active member of the U.S. war effort in Afghanistan and Pakistan.  The suicide bombing of the C.I.A. base was a military attack reportedly carried out by the Taliban and meant to take revenge for the C.I.A.'s killing of hundreds of innocent people in Afghanistan and Pakistan with the agency's current weapon of terror, the drone loaded with Hellfire missiles.  
Death from Above: A C.I.A. remote-controlled Predator drone fires a Hellfire missile.  This is fundamentally the same terror tactic that was used to kill thousands of Americans on 9-11.  Who has decided that the people on the ground deserve to die?  What is their crime?  Defending their homeland from foreign occupation?

Funeral in Pakistan for a victim of a C.I.A. drone attack.  Who determines who is a militant and who is a civilian?
The “failed al-Qaida bombing attempt” on Christmas Day in Detroit, on the other hand, is exactly the kind of false-flag terror attack I meant in my warning, although I hadn't anticipated the possibility of an "intentional dud," which this incident evidently was.  Readers of know that this was the first and only time I have published a false-flag terror warning based on my own understanding of the logic and players in the Zionist fraud known as the "War on Terror."

As I wrote on November 18:
The risk of another false-flag terror attack like the terror atrocities of 9-11 is currently very high…An Israeli-designed terror attack that is seen by the public as having been committed by Al Qaida would serve as an effective decision maker for Obama and swing public opinion behind sending more troops to the eight-year-old war of occupation in Afghanistan.  This is why I consider the chances of another terror attack to be blamed on Al Qaida to be very high at the moment.
The Christmas Day attack of the so-called Underwear Bomber on Delta’s Northwest Airlines Flight 253 is Mossad's idea of a joke but it is certainly meant to be taken with all seriousness by the Zionist-controlled media and corrupt politicians who make policy decisions based on such events.  Jeremy Bowen, Middle East Editor for the BBC, distilled the propaganda message of the Christmas Day bomber down to its simplest form for public consumption on January 5:
In Washington, President Obama is under pressure to take action. The Christmas Day attempted attack over Detroit may have failed, but it brought back instant memories of 9/11. Military action will continue.

One can imagine that the Israeli leaders Shimon Peres, Benjamin Netanyahu, Ehud Barak, and their fellow terrorists who planned this false-flag terror scenario, got a good laugh out of the inept Underwear Bomber – only at his expense and ours.  The level of false-flag terror absurdity in the United States has truly reached the level depicted in Brazil, the futuristic film of a world dominated by terrorism.  The Terry Gilliam film was actually produced by the Israeli weapons dealer and senior Mossadnik, Arnon Milchan (or Milchen), a close friend of Peres, Netanyahu, and Barak.  The Zionist terrorist masterminds chose Christmas Day for several reasons, primarily because of the increased psychological effect on Christians, but also because it is the one day of the year on which the security and passenger-screening crews would be largely staffed by people who don't celebrate Christmas.

The Israeli terror masterminds Shimon Peres, Bibi Netanyahu, and Ehud Barak
The attempted bombing of Flight 253 by the 23-year-old Nigerian was obviously not meant to destroy the plane.  Had Abdul Mutallab actually exploded his "explosive device" the terror event would have had no immediate propaganda value.  First, the wreckage would have to be found in the depths of the North Atlantic or expanses of eastern Canada and then an official investigation conducted to determine what had happened to the Delta flight that had suddenly disappeared from the radar screen.  It could take weeks or months before anyone would even be blamed for the attack.  That certainly wouldn't help the Zionist planners advance their "War on Terror" so it was decided to carry out an "attempted" bombing, like the earlier "shoe bomber," in which the inept bomber would be caught red-handed in the act of committing a terror atrocity.  

If the Underwear Bomber had really intended to destroy the flight, why would he have waited until the plane was making its final descent into the Detroit area before trying to detonate the explosive device?  Why was he so inept in his efforts with an explosive that required a different sort of detonation device?  Why did he seem like a person who had been mind-controlled to carry out the attempted bombing?  What possible motivation can the young son of a wealthy Nigerian banker have to kill innocent people over the skies of Detroit?  He is, after all, a devout Muslim.  Can we expect to get real answers to these questions?
Abdul Mutallab (in red), here in London, is known to be a devout Muslim.  What would be his motive to commit a terror crime against innocent people?  It simply does not make sense.
A group of Republican senators, led by the pro-Israel Republican John McCain (who visited Israel over the weekend of January 9-10) are seeking to transfer the Abdul Mutallab case to a military court.  Why would a pro-Israeli senator like McCain want this young Nigerian tried by a military tribunal?  McCain and others argue that critical questions such as the identities of those who assisted and trained Abdul Mutallab remain unanswered.  Indeed, they are and will probably remain so.  Did he receive funding and support from others, and if so, from whom?  The first question should be whether Abdul Mutallab was really in his right mind or whether he had been subjected to mind-control methods that made him an unwitting Manchurian Candidate.  Eyewitness reports about his appearance and initial responses strongly suggest that he was under some form of mind-control.  Will a trial in a U.S. District Court really get to the bottom of who is behind Abdul Mutallab?


To understand who is behind the Christmas Day bombing attempt one need only understand that the "War on Terror" is a complete Zionist fraud designed to drag the United States and other nations into a global war against Islamic movements seeking social justice in the Middle East and elsewhere.  Across the region there are many Islamic organizations, like the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt, which challenge the corrupt dictatorships that oppress their people and prevent real development.  The Mubarak dictatorship in Egypt, for example, is supported and funded with billions of dollars by the U.S. government to maintain a police state that is paid to support Israel while repressing the people of Egypt.  Such arrangements of maintaining political control through corruption are certainly not sustainable for the long term.  
The U.S. war in Afghanistan is supposedly being waged against Al Qaida because of their role in the terror attacks of 9-11, but the actual target has always been the Taliban, an Islamic movement.  Islamic movements of this type are naturally anti-Zionist.  The Israeli planners of the War on Terror seek to inflame passions on both sides to the point that the U.S. war on Islam takes on its own dynamic but that has not yet happened so the Zionist terrorists stoke the fire by creating false-flag terror events like 9-11 - and the attempted bombing of the Delta flight on Christmas Day.

The Mossad, Israel's secret service, has been operating in Yemen since the 1940's.  In 1949, the Mossad arranged for the removal of some 49,000 Yemenite Jews to Israel with the approval of Yemen's leader.  Michael Chertoff's "Mossadnik" mother, Livia Eisen, played a key role in this secret airlift, code-named Operation Magic Carpet, which involved some 380 flights on British and American aircraft.  Today, there are some 360,000 Yemenite Jews living in Israel.

Nearly all of Yemen's 49,000 Jews were taken to Israel in a Mossad operation in 1949-50 called Operation Magic Carpet.
The Israeli Mossad continues to operate in Yemen, as the President of Yemen Ali Abdullah Saleh revealed openly in early October 2008:  "A terrorist cell was arrested five days ago and will be referred to the judicial authorities for its links with the Israeli intelligence services."

The AFP and global press reported that the Israeli "terrorist cell" discovered by Yemeni authorities in 2008 had been involved in a deadly attack against the U.S. embassy in the Yemeni capital the previous month.  President Saleh said the Israeli terror cell operated under the "slogan of Islam."  Sources close to the Yemeni investigation told AFP that Saleh was thought to have been referring to six men rounded up in Sanaa after the 17 September 2008 attack on the U.S. Embassy which left 18 people dead.

An Israeli "Al Qaida" terror cell in Yemen is probably behind the kidnapping and mind-control operation that resulted in the devout Muslim Abdul Mutallab trying to detonate an explosive device on Delta's Northwest Flight 253.  The fact that Abdul Mutallab flew through Amsterdam's Schiphol Airport is a further indication that the Mossad is involved.  Both the Schiphol Airport and Delta Airlines are clients of ICTS (International Consultants on Targeted Security), the Mossad-controlled airport security company that oversaw passenger screening at the airports involved in the 9-11 attacks through its wholly-owned subsidiary Huntleigh USA.  While ICTS Europe is officially headquartered in Amsterdam, its real Mossad management is based in Israel.

Abdul Mutallab bought his tickets in Accra, Ghana, on December 16, eight days before he departed.  Although he flew to Detroit via Nigeria, his homeland, he did not visit or speak with his family.  This suggests that the young devout Muslim was being chaperoned and is simply another victim of a devious Israeli intelligence plot designed to promote the Zionist-managed "War on Terror" and legitimize President Obama's increased U.S. military involvement in Yemen, Afghanistan, and beyond.  We must not allow ourselves to be deceived by this most absurd and evil Israeli terror spectacle.  It is high time for the real culprits behind 9-11 and the false-flag terror of the past decade to be exposed and stopped.   
The young Abdul Mutallab in 2001

False Flag Terror Risk High as Obama Ponders Afghan Fiasco

November 18, 2009

The risk of another false-flag terror attack like the terror atrocities of 9-11 is currently very high.  This is not a prediction but a warning based on my analysis of 9-11 and the predicament that the U.S. and NATO find themselves in as they try to "pacify" occupied Afghanistan, a nation of fighting men who have always resisted foreign occupiers since Alexander the Great conquered the region and built Kandahar (Alexandria) in 330 B.C. 

The U.S. occupaton of Afghanistan has led to a huge increase in opium production.
(Photo - New York Times)
Unlike Alexander the Great, the U.S. has not built any new cities in Afghanistan and they are having a very hard time holding on to the capital, Kabul, which is the only place their installed puppet Hamid Karzai has any political power whatsoever.  The fact that Karzai stole the recent election through massive vote fraud exposes the lie that the U.S. is fighting to bring democracy to Afghanistan.  Thus far the U.S.-led occupation has only succeeded in producing bumper crops of opium for the illegal drug trade and putting in power one of the most corrupt regimes on Earth.  The cost of the illegal invasions and occupations of Afghanistan and Iraq is already more than $1 trillion, when one factors in the future costs that will be incurred from the long-term care for the thousands of seriously wounded and mentally disturbed U.S. veterans, which already number in the tens of thousands.  Pray tell, Mr. Obama, exactly what benefits have these illegal wars brought to the American people to justify such huge costs?  Why are we still slogging away against the people of Afghanistan?

An Afghan fighting man at a funeral of a fallen comrade.  The men of Afghanistan, mainly Pashtuns of Aryan stock, are fighting the U.S.-led occupation of their nation.  What would you do if your country were occupied?  Would you take up arms and fight to free your nation from occupation or would you submit to the occupying power?  This question is much more pertinent than most Americans realize.
As President Barack Hussein Obama ponders what to do about the fiasco in Afghanistan, the risk of a false-flag terror attack that forces his hand is greatly increased.  An Israeli-designed terror attack that is seen by the public as having been committed by Al Qaida would serve as an effective decision maker for Obama and swing public opinion behind sending more troops to the eight-year-old war of occupation in Afghanistan.  This is why I consider the chances of another terror attack to be blamed on Al Qaida to be very high at the moment.
The false-flag terror attack may not happen in the United States.  The U.S.-occupied nations of Iraq and Afghanistan (as well as Pakistan) suffer false-flag terror attacks on a weekly basis, especially when there is a foreign dignitary like Hillary Clinton around to impress.  These nations suffer terror casualties on the scale of 9-11 every year.  A spectacular terror attack during a high profile diplomatic visit is typical of Israeli-designed terror attacks.  They carried out one like this in Israel a few years ago across the street from the hotel of a visiting American diplomat to press their point.  The victims were mainly Russian immigrants.  Because it is much easier for the Zionists to carry out large scale false-flag terror attacks in these occupied nations there might be a terror attack on U.S. forces that compels Obama to send more forces.  What the architects of the "War on Terror" clearly need to do is try to get U.S. and Euopean public opinion behind their fraudulent war in Afghanistan.  They would be aiming to carry out a false-flag attack that decisively swings public opinion behind a massive increase in troops on the ground in occupied Afghanistan.

Why has Obama waited so long to decide what to do in Afghanistan?  The Zionist-controlled president obviously does not intend to bring the troops home and the status quo is clearly not working.  Obama, who will soon receive the Nobel Peace Prize, and his Zionist handlers are obviously reluctant to send tens of thousands more U.S. troops to a war of occupation that is very unpopular with Americans.  Fearing defeat and "mission failure", the U.S. military, NATO, and the Zionist-controlled media are clamoring for more troops to be sent as soon as possible, but if Obama were to send more troops he would lose even more support among his political base, which is really much weaker than the controlled media would have you believe.

The administration's plan to bring Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, the alleged "mastermind of 9-11," to New York City to stand trial may be part of this plan.  Why has it taken the Obama administration one year to come to this decision?  If Obama were truly serious about closing Guantanamo and seeing justice served, he would have made these moves last spring.  A trial for the person said to be Khalid Sheikh Mohammed would provide an ideal possibility for another false-flag terror attack in New York City.  One that killed the  9-11 terror suspects before they had a chance to be thoroughly interrogated in an open trial would probably be the desired outcome for the planners of the terror attack.

The person said to be Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, the "mastermind of 9-11," may arrive in New York City before Christmas.  The question is whether he is the real Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, who earned an engineering degree in North Carolina, or not.  Is he the same man as the person in the photographs below?  The Santa Claus beard and turban make a positive identification difficult.

Earlier images of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed
One has to remember that the real goal of the war in Afghanistan has nothing to do with democracy or the terrorism of 9-11.  The U.S.-led invasion and occupation is meant to occupy and pacify the country to allow for the construction of the TAPI pipeline to transport the Mossad-owned gas of Turkmenistan to India and China.  When this pipeline is built, the Mossadnik Yosef Maiman and his Israeli partners will become tremendously wealthy selling the gas resources of Turkmenistan, which they own and control. 

The TAPI pipeline will carry Israeli-owned gas of Turkmenistan to India and China bringing huge profits for the Mossad gangsters behind 9-11 and the fraudulent "War on Terror".
The Israelis certainly have not shelved this plan because of the high casualties being suffered by U.S. and NATO forces.  The Israeli terrorists who masterminded 9-11, the invasion of Afghanistan, and the utterly fraudulent "War on Terror" (e.g. Shimon Peres, Benjamin Netanyahu, and Ehud Barak) are at the top of their game -- and running the Israeli government.

The Zionist Terror Troika - Shimon Peres, Benjamin Netanyahu, and Ehud Barak
The current Israeli government is very close to the Obama administration.  With Rahm Emanuel, the son of a Zionist terrorist, running the White House, one might think that the Israeli government is calling the shots in the Oval Office.  As Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu told Lally Weymouth, senior editor ofNewsweek and The Washington Post  (both owned by her family, the descendants of the Zionist and German Jewish banker Eugene Meyer), in late October 2009:
There is much greater cooperation and transparency between the Obama administration and my government than people know. We speak openly and I greatly appreciate steps taken by the Obama administration against the distorted Goldstone report and their pressure on Iran to stop its military nuclear program as well as the ongoing efforts we are making to re-launch the peace negotiations between us and the Palestinians.

Rahm Emanuel, the son of a Zionist terrorist from the Stern Gang, runs the Obama White House.  The president is kept in an information bubble and handled like a puppet by his Zionist handlers who have managed him since 1992.

David Axelrod was commissioned by Chicago-based Elder of Zion Philip M. Klutznick to be Obama's adviser in 1992.  Axelrod created Obama the candidate by crafting his political strategy and writing his speeches.  He still performs these functions for Obama the president.  But who does Axelrod, the son of a Jewish communist, take his orders from?
Lally Weymouth is the daughter of Katharine (Meyer) Graham and grandaughter of Eugene Isaac Meyer, the Zionist Jew banker of Lazard Freres who served as Chairman of the Federal Reserve from 1930 to 1933 and who bought The Washington Post at a bankruptcy auction in 1933.  Like most U.S. news outlets, both the New York Times and Washington Post are owned by Zionist Jewish families.
Sources and Recommended Reading:

Christopher Bollyn, "Why Afghanistan?" September 28, 2009

Bollyn, "The Great Game - The War For Caspian Oil And Gas," October 14, 2001

Bollyn, "Gitmo Gulag Process Falls into Chaos," July 16, 2009

Bollyn, "Terror Mastermind KSM is an Imposter - The Confession is Fake," March 16, 2007

Bollyn, "The Absence of Justice for 9/11 Victims," March 20, 2007

Bollyn, "When and Where was Khalid Sheikh Mohammed Captured - or Killed?" March 16, 2007

Gitmo Gulag Fraud and Chaos

July 16, 2009

An image of the person said to be Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, the "mastermind of 9-11," and the feeble-minded scapegoat Ahmed Qadus.  Are they the same person?  I asked Dr. David E. Klett, a retired professor of thermodynamics, who had the real KSM in several of his classes, if he recognized the person said to be KSM. "I did not recognize that person," Klett said.  "I never saw that face before."
The BBC is reporting that the fraudulent Soviet-style military tribunals in Gitmo have fallen into chaos (not a big fall for such a seriously flawed process).  The article, "Chaos besets 9/11 court hearing," reports:
Scenes of chaos have gripped a US military court in Guantanamo Bay where five alleged 9/11 plotters were due to appear together before a judge.  All five, including alleged mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, initially refused to attend the hearing.  The judge rejected prosecution calls for them to be compelled to attend but three did appear after a recess.  The hearing focuses on whether two of the accused are mentally competent to represent themselves...

Thursday's hearing was meant to focus on whether Mr Hawsawi and a fourth defendant, Ramzi Binalshibh, were mentally competent to represent themselves.  The US military lawyer representing Mr Binalshibh said he suffered from a delusional disorder.  When the lawyer went into detail about how he had been deprived of sleep, her microphone was cut off...

The fifth defendant, Mr Sheikh Mohammed, refused to attend the hearing.  Described by US intelligence as "one of history's most infamous terrorists", he earlier admitted being responsible "from A to Z" for 9/11.  Believed to be the number three al-Qaeda leader before his capture in Pakistan in March 2003, he told a pre-trial hearing at Guantanamo in December 2008 that he wanted to plead guilty to all charges against him.
It should be noted that the person who is said by the U.S. government to be Khalid Sheikh Mohammed is clearly not who they say he is.  My research has found that the evidence indicates that he is another person, a feeble-minded person who is being scape-goated as the "mastermind of 9-11."  I have written about this in several articles.  I spoke with a former professor who taught KSM at a university in North Carolina.  Shown the photos of the person said to be KSM, the professor said he had never seen that face before.

Images of the real Khalid Sheikh Mohammed
The three articles (No. 6,7, and 8) about the hoax of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed can be read near the end of the webpage with my articles from 2007 about 9-11:

No. 6  "Terror Mastermind KSM is an Imposter - The Confession is Fake," 16 March 2007

No. 7  "When and Where was Khalid Sheikh Mohammed Captured - or Killed?" 16 March 2007

No. 8  "The Absence of Justice for 9-11 Victims," March  2007

Richard Holbrooke and the Zionist War on Terror

July 7, 2009

Dick Holbrooke in Afghanistan in 2006. 
Understanding Holbrooke's mission in Central Asia requires knowing who this "hyperaggressive" Zionist "master of disaster" really is.  War weary Americans who hoped the new Obama administration would change U.S. policies in Iraq and Afghanistan and bring the troops home must be sorely disappointed.  The only Americans coming home these days are those who have died in the senseless conflict. More troops are being sent to fight a war that is understood neither by the American public nor by the people doing the fighting.

Americans are coming home from Afghanistan in caskets under the cover of night. 
Admiral Michael Mullen, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, appeared on "Face the Nation" on Sunday, July 5, to discuss U.S. military actions in the Middle East.  During the interview Mullen revealed what he called the real strategy in Afghanistan:  to clear, hold, and build.  The first question asked of Mullen was about the military situation in Afghanistan as the U.S. Marines carry out a large offensive known as Operation Strike of the Sword or Operation Khanjar (Arabic for "dagger"): 

Admiral Mike Mullen:  I suspect it’s going to be tough for a while. And again, we have enough forces there now not just to clear an area but to hold it so we can build after. And that’s really the strategy. 

The logical question to ask Mullen would have been, "What is it that we want to build in Afghanistan?" although John Dickerson of CBS News did not ask.  If building is "really the strategy" in Afghanistan as Admiral Mullen says, what is it that so badly needs to be built? 


U.S. troops have been in Afghanistan since October 2001 when they were supposedly sent in response to 9-11, although no Afghans were involved in the terror attacks.  The stated aim of the Anglo-American invasion of Afghanistan in 2001 was to find Osama Bin Laden and other Al Qaida members and put them on trial.  The U.S., however, said it had given up its pursuit of Osama Bin Laden years ago.  So why did the U.S. and Britain really invade Afghanistan -- and why are we still there?  Why has President Obama increased troop levels in Afghanistan?  The short answer is the TAPI gas pipeline, which will carry gas from Israeli-owned and managed gas fields in Turkmenistan to Afghanistan, Pakistan, India, and China.

The TAPI pipeline needs to cross Helmand province in the south of Afghanistan.

Turkmenistan and Afghanistan are both very rich in gas reserves.  The Turkmen mineral assets are managed by the former Mossad agent Yosef Maiman.  Building the TAPI pipeline is a Zionist pipe dream that will use the mineral wealth of Turkmenistan to benefit Maiman and his partners.  This is the main development project that U.S. policy is trying to accomplish.  Transit fees from the gas pipeline are intended to support the government in Kabul. 

Yosef Maiman, Israeli Mossad agent, owns much of the gas of Turkmenistan and controls all of it.
Admiral Mullen touched on this development in the interview: 
We’ve got to move to a point where there’s security so that the economic underpinnings can start to move, development, that we can create governance so that the Afghan people can get goods and services consistently from their government. 
Are we to believe that the U.S. is fighting an 8-year war in Afghanistan in order to make sure the Afghans can get "goods and services consistently from their government?"  Have we spent hundreds of billions of dollars in Afghanistan so we can build post offices, train stations, and power plants?  What are the "economic underpinnings" that need to "start to move?"  Why would the U.S. government care more about providing "goods and services" to the people of Afghanistan than, say, the people of California?
Mullen touched only lightly on the subject and CBS News was certainly not asking the questions that would allow Americans to really understand the U.S. strategy in Afghanistan.

"The economic development the generals talk about, including gas pipeline construction, requires stability," Gary Leupp wrote inCounterpunch on July 6, "But Afghanistan, like Iraq, was destabilized precisely by a U.S. attack and occupation in the first place. More ominously, Pakistan has been destabilized by the invasion of the next-door country."  Why are Americans fighting wars in Central Asia for a pipeline from Turkmenistan?

To understand why Obama is pushing the war in Afghanistan, one needs to understand that the Obama administration is really a Zionist-controlled government.  If this were not already abundantly clear, it can be seen by the person appointed to apply U.S. policy in the region.  That person is Richard Charles Albert Holbrooke, one of Obama's first appointments.  Holbrooke, a Zionist Jew and a long-time associate of Henry Kissinger, is the Special Representative for Afghanistan and Pakistan.  Holbrooke is described by State Dept. workers as "abrasive and arrogant."  He is a student of Kissinger-style diplomacy with a "hyperaggressive style," according to Meryl Gordon of New York Magazine. Holbrooke and Kissinger have been friends and co-workers since the early 1960s in Vietnam.  Gordon wrote that Holbrooke is often described as "arrogant, ambitious, pushy, relentless, argumentative, ego-obsessed, social-climbing, and just plain rude." James Hoge, editor of Foreign Affairs said, Holbrooke is brusque and impatient with those who disagree with him. "Dick can't brook argument. He's right, you're wrong."

Holbrooke was a director of Maurice Greenberg's incredibly badly-run A.I.G. insurance company from 2001-2008.  A.I.G. is really a criminal enterprise, indicted on numerous charges, which insured investment banks against losses from the extremely risky financial "instruments" that caused the financial collapse of 2008.  When these risky instruments failed, A.I.G. was bailed out with more than $180 billion of U.S. taxpayer dollars, which it then distributed to the dodgy investment banks it had insured.  A.I.G. has already cost every man, woman, and child in the United States about $600 each.  Holbrooke was a key insider in this tremendous scam. 

Greenberg and A.I.G. are also involved in the terror attacks of 9-11 and the fraudulent "War on Terror" in many ways.  The first plane that struck the World Trade Center, for example, flew directly into the secure computer room of a Greenberg-owned and managed company, Marsh. 

Prior to A.I.G., Holbrooke was a vice chairman at Credit Suisse First Boston.  First Boston was the place where the mortgage-based securities were first created under Laurence D. Fink.  (Fink developed mortgage-based securities at First Boston in the mid-1970s when 9-11 "whistle-blower" Indira Singh worked there on the IT and risk consulting end of the business.) 

On January 22, two days after taking office, Obama named Holbrooke as special envoy to Afghanistan and Pakistan.  At this point, the U.S. government had already bailed-out Holbrooke's company to the tune of some $180 billion, the largest government bail-out in U.S. history.  Yet two months later, Obama blasted A.I.G., calling their business practices "outrageous" and trying to distance his administration, which includes a former director of A.I.G., from the tremendous cost the A.I.G. bail-out imposed on the U.S. taxpayer:  "Nobody here was responsible for supervising A.I.G. and allowing themselves to put the economy at risk by some of the outrageous behavior that they were engaged in," the president said. 

Richard Holbrooke of A.I.G. and George Mitchell were both early Obama appointments. 
Obama reportedly did not talk with Holbrooke about the $180 billion bail-out of the company he had been a long-time director of.  Instead he lied by saying no one in his administration was responsible for supervising A.I.G.

Obama's denial is clearly not true.  Holbrooke, an Obama appointee, had his hands deep in the A.I.G. scam for 8 years and had made a good living doing so.  
Fox News reported on March 19, 2009, that Holbrooke made more than $250,000 a year as a director at A.I.G.: 

Holbrooke joined AIG's board in February 2001 and resigned in July 2008, two months before the company nearly collapsed. Over more than seven years as a board member, he may have earned as much as $800,000 in cash and company stock, according to AIG financial documents filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. 

Since September, AIG has received $180 billion in taxpayer money to keep it from failing and causing more damage to the U.S. economy…

For much of his tenure on the AIG board, Holbrooke had a role in approving salaries and compensation. From 2001 until mid-2005, he was a member of the board's compensation committee. According to AIG financial statements, the committee sets the salary for the company's chief executive officer [Maurice Greenberg] and gives advice on how other senior managers are to be compensated. 


When critics call the conflict in Afghanistan "Obama's Vietnam" they are not far off.  Holbrooke was a key player in the Vietnam war from 1962 to 1969.  His biography concerning Viet Nam looks like this:  Joined Foreign Service US Department State, 1962, served in South Vietnam Saigon, 1963-66; staff member The White House, 1966-67; assigned US Department State; staff Paris Peace Talks on Vietnam, 1968-69. 

From his high-level position in the development of the war in Viet Nam as assistant to ambassador Henry Cabot Lodge, Holbrooke and Henry Kissinger have worked closely together since the early-1960s.Holbrooke was sent to Vietnam in 1962 to serve as an assistant to ambassador Lodge, while Henry Kissinger, a Harvard professor, was the ambassador's adviser. Gordon wrote that Kissinger recalled watching a parade in Saigon from Holbrooke's apartment.

Holbrooke and Kissinger have continued to work very closely together at the American Academy in Berlin, which they founded in 1994.  The academy is located in a lakeside mansion across from the train station in Wannsee.  In 2008, Holbrooke gave the Kissinger award to George H.W. Bush. Why are Holbrooke and Kissinger giving prizes to former U.S. presidents?

George W. Bush receiving the Kissinger Prize in 2008
In an odd breach of diplomatic protocol, Henry Kissinger was sent by the Obama administration to hold high-level talks with the leaders of Russia in March instead of the Secretary of State.  Why was Kissinger speaking for the United States under the newly-elected Obama administration? Who really makes U.S. foreign policy?

Kissinger meeting Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin on March 19, 2009
Holbrooke also played a key role in the U.S.-led bombing and subsequent Balkanization of Yugoslavia, in which the formerly prosperous and socialist nation was carved up into ethnic mini-statelets.  The breaking up of Yugoslavia resulted in a significant reduction in the standard of living across the nation.  NATO continues to control the statelet of Kosovo, which was literally ripped off from Serbia along with Trepca, one of the richest mines in Europe. 

The New York Times of May 5, 2009 describes Holbrooke as a key member of the Obama team and says he is being considered as a possible national security adviser. During the disastrous conflict in August between Russia and Georgia, the NYT profile says Holbrooke "was one of the first Americans to fly to Tbilisi to meet with the Georgian leader Mikhail Saakashvili, a friend."  Whatever advice Holbrooke gave his "friend" Saakashvili was clearly bad advice.

Holbrooke, who is called "the bulldozer" by some who know him, is a pushy individual who has been involved at the highest level in one disaster after another since the early 1960s.  Now he is the point man in a disastrous and senseless war in Central Asia, which has gotten much worse since he joined the effort in January 2009.  Why is Holbrooke put into such positions of power in the first place?  The man, after all, has a long record of creating mega-disasters. 

Holbrooke visited refugees who had been driven from Pakistan's Swat valley in early June.  "Are you glad the army came in, even though you were driven out of your homes?" Holbrooke reportedly asked the refugees.
To understand why Holbrooke is put into these positions, it is necessary to understand who he really is.  Although it is not reported in biographical sketches, Holbrooke belongs to a very highly-connected family that is related to the Rothschild and Guggenheim families, among others.  It is his German Jewish family connections that have placed him in positions of power in the U.S. government. 

Richard Charles Albert Holbrooke was born April 24, 1941, to Dan Holbrooke and Gertrudis "Trudi" Moos Holbrooke.  Dan, his father, was a Polish Jewish immigrant who changed his name to Holbrooke.  Biographical sketches claim that Dan's original surname has been lost, which is very unlikely.  Dan Holbrooke's real name has been hidden in the same way that the family has sought to hide its Jewish roots.  But why would the Holbrooke family want to hide its Jewishness? 
Celia Mcgee of the New York Observer wrote about Holbrooke in 1998: 

The son of Dan and Trudi Holbrooke, raised in Scarsdale, N.Y., schooled at Brown University, he was a son of assimilated, upper-class Jews who fled Nazi racism. "I've been with him plenty of times when his Jewishness was obvious," said his friend Stanley Karnow, the journalist and author, "and he jokes about it plenty, too. It just isn't an issue with him, or Kati." 

Holbrooke's father, whose real name is not known, died when Holbrooke was 16.  His mother comes from the influential merchant Moos family of Baden-Württemberg in southern Germany.  The Moos family is engaged in leather trading and moved their business to Argentina in 1922.  Holbrooke's grandfather Samuel Moos was born in Reutlingen in 1889 and married Valesca Friedheim of Zurich.  Samuel and Valesca lived in Buenos Aires where the leather-trading business is run in the name of the company founder, Elias Moos S.A. 

The Moos family, which is related by marriage to the Rothschild, Guggenheim, Weil, Marx, and Einstein families, traveled frequently by ship between Buenos Aires, New York, and Europe.  There is even a seminar room at Tel Aviv University named in honor of Samuel and Valesca Moos.  The Moos family collected nearly 1 million Swiss francs from Switzerland in 2007 for money they claimed to have lost in accounts during the war, which was multiplied by a factor of 12.

The graves of Ludwig Rothschild and his wife Hanchen Moos in the Jewish graveyard of Gailingen, Germany.
By understanding who Richard Holbrooke really is, what his agenda is, and who he is working for, we can see that there is a secret Zionist agenda behind the war in Afghanistan.  With the appointment of Holbrooke, who is known as "the bulldozer" to oversee U.S. policy in the region, the 8-year-old war which has now spread to Pakistan is bound to become much worse.  The strategic goal of the war in Afghanistan has nothing to do with terrorism and never did.   Officials and media who claim that it is are simply lying. 

Gordon, Meryl, "Ambassador A-List," New York Magazine, December 27, 1999

Leupp, Gary, "
Operation Khanjar Begins," CounterPunch, July 6, 2009 

Obama's Deception - 9-11 and Afghanistan

June 5, 2009

St. Michael the Archangel slaying the devil, the father of all lies and deception.
All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent.
- Thomas Jefferson 
President Barack Obama's speech in Cairo on June 4 was a carefully prepared speech meant to explain the administration's policies in the Middle East to the people of the region.  I listened to see how he would explain his controversial decision to increase the number of U.S. troops and military activity in Afghanistan and Pakistan, a decision I strongly oppose.  What I heard in Obama's speech about Afghanistan was very discouraging in that it revealed the appalling continuation of the blatant 9-11 deception by the new administration.  The war and occupation of Afghanistan was the first subject Obama addressed.  The following extract is the essence of what Obama said about 9-11 and the war in Afghanistan and Pakistan: 

The first issue that we have to confront is violent extremism in all its forms. In Ankara, I made clear that America is not and never will be at war with Islam.  We will, however, relentlessly confront violent extremists who pose a grave threat to our security because we reject the same thing that people of all faiths reject, the killing of innocent men, women, and children. And it is my first duty as president to protect the American people.

The situation in Afghanistan demonstrates America's goals and our need to work together. Over seven years ago, the United States pursued Al Qaida and the Taliban with broad international support. We did not go by choice. We went because of necessity. I'm aware that there's still some who would question or even justify the offense of 9/11. But let us be clear. Al Qaida killed nearly 3,000 people on that day.

The victims were innocent men, women, and children from America and many other nations who had done nothing to harm anybody. And yet Al Qaida chose to ruthlessly murder these people, claimed credit for the attack, and even now states their determination to kill on a massive scale. They have affiliates in many countries and are trying to expand their reach. 
These are not opinions to be debated. These are facts to be dealt with. Make no mistake, we do not want to keep our troops in Afghanistan. We see no military -- we seek no military bases there. It is agonizing for America to lose our young men and women. It is costly and politically difficult to continue this conflict.

We would gladly bring every single one of our troops home if we could be confident that there were not violent extremists in Afghanistan and now Pakistan determined to kill as many Americans as they possibly can. But that is not yet the case.

And that's why we're partnering with a coalition of 46 countries. And despite the costs involved, America's commitment will not weaken

This is how Obama explained the U.S. war effort in Afghanistan and Pakistan:  As a necessary confrontation with 45 nations against the violent extremists behind the attacks of 9-11.  We would bring our troops home, he said, if there were no "violent extremists" in those countries "determined to kill as many Americans as they possibly can." 

What is the real reason behind Obama's war in Afghanistan?
The people of Afghanistan do not like President Obama or trust the United States.  Stan Grant, a CNN correspondent in Kabul, visited an Afghan university (madrassa) to see how the middle and upper-class students reacted to Obama and his speech in Cairo.  Not a single student liked Obama or supported his policies in their occupied nation.

If Obama had a good policy why has our society not developed in the past five years, one student asked.  Another wanted to know why the U.S. and NATO had killed 1,000 Afghan civilians.  "What was the matter with them? he asked.   

"Zoya," a member of the Revolutionary Association of the Women of Afghanistan (RAWA), received international acclaim with the 2003 publication her dramatic life story: "Zoya's Story: An Afghan Woman's Battle for Freedom," with John Follain and Rita Cristofari.  In 2008, Zoya was interviewed in Berlin by Elsa Rassbach.  Zoya explained how she viewed the U.S. and NATO occupation of Afghanistan:

RAWA supports the call for the withdrawal of the U.S. and NATO troops because occupation is not a solution. They are constantly killing civilians, even at a wedding party. Do you think we are not human beings and don't have hearts? What would Americans do if an occupier were killing so many civilians in the U.S.? …

In 2001, the U.S. and its allies occupied Afghanistan under the beautiful slogans of "war on terror," "women's rights," "liberation" and "democracy." But when they installed the brutal and criminal warlords after the fall of the Taliban, everyone knew that Afghanistan had once again become a chessboard for world powers. The plight of our people, and especially of women, has been misused to legitimize the foreign military presence in our country.

Afghan people have been badly betrayed by the U.S. and NATO in the past few years. Despite billions in aid, Afghan people are living under awful conditions that are worse than they were under the Taliban medieval rule. Afghanistan still faces a women's rights tragedy, and the everyday hardships of our masses are beyond imagination.

Everyone knows that the U.S., a superpower, together with the biggest military pact in the world, NATO, could in a matter of days, if not hours, defeat the Taliban and arrest Mullah Omer and Osama. But today they need such enemies to justify keeping their military machine in Afghanistan.

We don't want their so-called liberation and democracy. If these troops do not withdraw, we are sure that the Afghan people will have no other option but to rise up against them. Our people are already deeply fed up with the situation. The jokes being made in Afghanistan are that the Taliban is getting the most from this situation. 

Al Qaida was behind the mass murder of thousands of people on 9-11, Obama said.  This is not an opinion to be debated, he added.  "These are facts to be dealt with." 

If the Obama administration were truly concerned about facts, he might take note of the disturbing fact that not a single 9-11 victim's case has gone to trial after nearly 8 years.  If the case against Osama Bin Laden and his agents were solid and based on facts, why has the evidence not been presented in an open trial in a U.S. court?  The military is supposedly holding Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, the "confessed" mastermind of 9-11, in Guantanamo.  Why is this mastermind of terror not put on trial in an open court?  Why have the surviving airplane parts not been identified?  Why has the evidence of thermite in the collapsed towers not been addressed? 

One of the 9-11 facts the Obama administration will have to deal with is the evidence of super-thermite in the dust of the World Trade Center.  This thin layer of super-thermite was evidently used to pulverize the concrete in the twin towers on 9-11.  The people who applied tens of tons of thermite to the interiors of the twin towers are, in fact, directly responsible for the murder of 3,000 people on 9-11.  If Al Qaida had teams of men spraying super-thermite and placing explosive charges in the buildings leased and owned by Larry Silverstein and the Israeli commando Frank Lowy, let's see the evidence.  Otherwise, let's find out who really put the super-thermite in the twin towers. 

The United States went to war in Afghanistan out of "necessity," Obama said, yet the American public has not been given any solid evidence to prove that the Taliban of Afghanistan had anything to do with 9-11.  Why then is the Zionist-run Obama administration sending more troops to Afghanistan?  And why have they expanded the war into Pakistan? 

I have discussed in several articles the powerful Zionists behind the Obama White House.  Obama was sponsored and molded since 1992 to be the first black president of the United States by the daughter of Philip Morris Klutznick, the former president of the B'nai B'rith and mega Zionist from Chicago.  The chief of staff of the White House is Rahm Emanuel, an Israeli national whose father was a member of a Zionist terrorist organization in Palestine that was allied with Nazi Germany.  These are a few real facts, not opinions, that need to be dealt with. 

Understanding the Zionist nature of the Obama administration, the question that must be asked is why is the administration expanding the war in Afghanistan and Pakistan?  The American people certainly have no real interest in Afghanistan or Pakistan and the Afghans and Pakistanis have no real interest in America.  There must be a Zionist strategic goal in controlling these two Central Asian nations, but what is it? 

As I pointed out in my article from 2001, "The Great Game:  The War for Caspian Oil and Gas," the Israelis are deeply engaged in the region: 

Turkmenistan and Azerbijan are also both closely allied with Israeli commercial interests and Israeli military intelligence. In Turkmenistan, a former Israeli intelligence agent, Yosef A. Maiman, president of Merhav Group of Israel, is the official negotiator and policy maker responsible for developing the energy resources of Turkmenistan. 

"This is the Great Game all over," Maiman told the Wall Street Journal about his role in furthering the "geopolitical goals of both the U.S. and Israel in Central Asia.  "We are doing what U.S. and Israeli policy could not achieve," he said, "Controlling the transport route is controlling the product." 

"Those that control the oil routes out of Central Asia will impact all future direction and quantities of flow and the distribution of revenues from new production," said energy expert James Dorian recently in Oil & Gas Journal on September 10, 2001. 

Foreign business in Turkmenistan is dominated by Maiman's Merhav Group, according to the Washington Report on Middle East Affairs (WRMEA). Maiman, who was made a citizen of Turkmenistan by presidential decree, serves as Turkmenistan's official negotiator for its gas pipeline, special ambassador, and right-hand man for the authoritarian President Saparmurad Atayevich Niyazov, a former Politburo member of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union. 

The Merhav Group of Israel officially represents the Turkmen government and has brokered all of the energy projects in Turkmenistan, contracts worth many billions of dollars. 


The main Zionist goal in Afghanistan and Pakistan is to "pacify" these nations to allow the Turkmenistan-Afghanistan-Pakistan-India (TAPI) gas pipeline to be built.  This line, once completed, could be extended to China.  This project is the pipe dream of Joseph A. Maiman (a.k.a. Josef, Yosef, Yossi), one of the most powerful men in Israel. 

Yosef A. Maiman
The Jerusalem Post of 23 July 2004, described Maiman as one of the leading miners of the gas of Central Asia, specifically Turkmenistan:
Though his sprawling multi-billion-dollar empire stretches from Channel 10 TV, where he is a partner, to Central Asian gas fields, where he is a leading miner, Maiman was born humbly, in a displaced persons camp in Germany, and grew up in Peru. 

Maiman's Merhav Group started off in 1976 with Third World debt-financing, but later diversified into agriculture, energy solutions and telecoms. Today, it is the Republic of Turkmenistan's single largest foreign partner. 

Just two weeks ago, the Israeli foreign ministry announced it would open a new embassy in Ashgabat, Turkmenistan, "saying it was a natural step in burgeoning bilateral ties, and reflected a new momentum in Israel's overall ties with the Central Asian countries," according to the Jerusalem Post of 21 May 2009. 

Turkmenistan is reported to be "the second largest holder of gas reserves in the world, with some 28 trillion cubic meters of proven gas reserves," second only to Russia.  The "former" Israeli Mossad agent Joseph A. Maiman is reportedly the owner or co-owner of much of that gas and has been the key person managing the development of Turkmenistan's gas fields.  If the TAPI pipeline were to be completed, the Israelis connected with Maiman and Merhav would collect tens of billions of dollars by selling the gas of Turkmenistan to Pakistan, India, and China.  This is certainly one of the key Israeli strategic goals in Afghanistan and Pakistan.  The pipeline is meant to pass through Kandahar, the area where Canadians are serving and which Canada is obliged to defend until 2012. 

The planned route of the TAPI pipeline
Mr. Maiman is also a business partner of Rupert Murdoch and Ronald Lauder.  In November 2002, Yossi Maiman and the former head of the Mossad, Shabtai Shavit, launched a new political party with the former head of the Shin Bet, Ya'acov Perry.  These people are all closely tied to the false-flag terror attacks of 9-11.  Their roles are described in my chapter entitled, "The Architecture of Terror." 

To really understand why the Obama administration is sending more troops to Afghanistan and waging war in Pakistan it is essential to understand what is at stake and who will benefit from the TAPI pipeline.  Obama's speech in Cairo today was a blatant deception about the real purposes of the war in Central Asia.


Obama flew to Germany after speaking in Cairo and landed in Dresden, the Saxon capital city on the Elbe.  Dresden was completely obliterated in a huge Allied fire-bombing attack on Valentines Day and Ash Wednesday 1945.  Eyewitnesses to the holocaust of Dresden estimate that more than 500,000 people, including many refugees who were sheltering in the "safe" city, were killed in the attack in which the entire inner city was incinerated.  Obama made a short visit to the re-built Frauenkirche and did not even address the painful subject of the Allied war crime that killed so many innocent lives in Dresden.  He then went on to visit the Buchenwald concentration camp in the outskirts of Weimar where Elie Wiesel spoke at great length about the 11,000 Jews who are said to have perished in the work camp.   CNN played up the fact that the camp had a crematorium with three ovens, but it did not visit the mountain of rubble in Dresden or the huge mass grave where the remains of thousands of the victims of one of the most cruel war crimes are buried.  Sixty-five years later, the controlled media still ignores this subject.

I spent a month in Dresden and visited Buchenwald.  I discovered that the death rate for German prisoners held in Buchenwald during the Soviet occupation was much higher than the death rate in the camp during the war.  Here are a few extracts from my Letter from Buchenwald:

According to a U.S. Army report dated May 25, 1945, a total of 238,980 prisoners had been held at Buchenwald in the period from July 1937 to April 1945. Of this number 34,375 died. This report, which shows a mortality rate of some 14 percent, was based on camp records confiscated by the U.S. Army.

Shortly after the U.S. Army "liberated" Buchenwald, it was turned over to the Soviet Union and became the so-called Special Camp No. 2 from 1945 to 1950. As the guide book, written by Sabine and Harry Stein says, "Prisoners moved into the barracks again hardly four weeks after the last survivors had left the National Socialist concentration camp in Buchenwald. Buchenwald became a place of isolation and death for another four and a half years....

"Hunger and isolation seriously affected everyday life. Hunger was almost omnipresent. Mass deaths ensued when the restricted rations were cut temporarily.

"More than one third of the total number of 122,671 prisoners died in the course of being there," the guide says about the post-war Soviet prison camp. "The victims of Buchenwald Special Camp were buried in mass graves. Their relatives did not receive any official notification.

"The history of Special Camp No. 2 and the existence of mass graves was subject to taboo in the German Democratic Republic," the guide says.

The official mortality rate in the Soviet camps during the post-war period was more than twice that of Buchenwald during the war. According to camp records kept by the Soviet Union, the Soviet prison camp system in Germany held 122,671 prisoners between 1945 and 1950 of which 42,889 died. This is a death rate of nearly 35 percent. In addition, 756 persons were executed.
To understand what really happened in both of these places, I recommend reading my articles from Buchenwald and Dresden.


Sources and Recommended Reading

About Buchenwald and Dresden:

Bollyn, Christopher, "
Letter from Buchenwald," November 12, 2005

Bollyn, "
Letter from Slaughterhouse Five," February 19, 2004

Bollyn, "
The Passing of Kurt Vonnegut - An Eyewitness to the Holocaust of Dresden
, April 12, 2007

About Afghanistan and the Deception of 9-11:

Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe," Steven E. Jones et al, The Open Chemical Physics Journal, March 2009
Bollyn, Christopher, "The Great Game: The War for Caspian Oil And Gas," September 25, 2001

Bollyn, "
Obama and the Jews," April 2008

Bollyn, "
The Israeli Who Will Run the Obama White House
," November 6, 2008

Democracy' in Afghanistan - Code for Occupation," New America Media, Elsa Rassbach's 2008 interview with Afghan woman "Zoya" of the Revolutionary Association of the Women of Afghanistan (RAWA) New America Media New America Media, May 29, 2009

Grant, Stan, "
Afghan youths wary about Obama," CNN, June 4, 2009
Keinon, Herb, "Israel opens 3 new diplomatic missions," Jerusalem Post, May 21, 2009
President Obama's Speech on a New Beginning, Cairo, Egypt, June 4, 2009

Schechter, Erik, "I spy," Jerusalem Post, July 23, 2004

Turkmenistan: World’s Second Largest Holder of Gas Reserves
,", October 24, 2008

No comments:

Post a Comment