America: Land of the Poor
by Stephen Lendman
March 8, 2012
Years ago, who could have imagined the appalling growing poverty level in the world's richest country?
Various reports confirm it, including a new one by the University of Michigan's National Poverty Center (NPC), titled "Extreme Poverty in the United States, 1996 to 2011".
NPC
promotes multidisciplinary research on poverty and policy. It mentors
and trains poverty researchers. It analyzes causes and consequences, and
addresses pressing policy questions at both federal and state levels.
How
is poverty calculated, it asked? The Census Bureau issues annual
thresholds. They represent minimal income levels required to support
various family sizes.
Its
methodology dates from the mid-1960s and hasn't changed. Inflation's
taken into account annually. Families are judged poor based on pretax
income. Non-cash benefits aren't counted, such as Medicaid and food
stamps.
In 2010, singles under 65 with incomes of $11,344 or less were designated poor. For those over 65, it was $10,458.
For
single parents with one child, it's $15,030. With two children, it's
$17,568. For two adults with no children, it's $14,602. With one child,
it's $17,552. With two children, it's $22,113. With three children, it's
$26,023.
Adjusted
for inflation, current thresholds are slightly higher, but bear no
relation to reality. Individuals and families need double or more these
levels to avoid poverty. Moreover, jerry-rigged inflation numbers
further distort cost of living effects on all households.
The
Department of Health and Human Services has its own federal aid
eligibility guidelines. They differ slightly from Census numbers, and
reflect marginally higher Alaska and Hawaii thresholds.
NPC's
H. Luke Shaefer and Harvard Kennedy School's Kathryn Edin studied how
Clinton's 1996 welfare reform affected millions of poor Americans.
The
Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation ("welfare
reform") Act (PRWORA) changed eligibility rules. From 1935 until then,
needy households got welfare payments through Aid to Families with
Dependent Children (AFDC). It protected states by sharing caseload costs
during hard times.
Thereafter,
Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) set five year time
limits. It gave states fixed block grants to administer at their own
discretion. As a result, America's most needy face huge risks during
economic downturns when reduced federal aid exacerbates dire conditions.
Under
TANF, recipients must work or receive job training, even during hard
times when employment's harder than ever to find. Moreover, single
mothers with young children are grievously impacted. During their most
formative years, children need them as caregivers.
With
increasing austerity official federal policy, protracted harder than
ever hard times are assured. Future NPC and other reports will reflect
them.
For
example, in 1994/1995, AFDC served 75% of impoverished families with
children. In 2008-2009, it was 28%. The percentage varies by state. Some
help fewer than 10% of impoverished families.
Moreover,
when TANF was established, contingency fund assurances were given. That
was then. Austerity demands little or none. The 2009 Recovery Act
included TANF Emergency Fund aid. In September 2010, it wasn't renewed.
During
today's dire economic times, budget strapped states force-feed harsh
cuts. Vulnerable residents are harmed most, including families with
children on TANF.
Moreover,
its benefits are half or less poverty thresholds. Based on real
inflation adjusted dollars, they've dropped precipitously since 1996.
In
2011, NPC estimates 1.46 million US households lived on $2 or less a
day. It reflects a 130% increase from 636,000 in 1996. Around 2.8
million children live in extreme poverty. It represents 16% of all those
impoverished.
Supplemental
Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits reduce, but don't
eliminate extreme poverty. So-called reform, said NPC, "has been
followed by a dramatic decline in case assistance caseloads."
They
dropped from around 12.3 million 1996 monthly recipients to 4.4 million
in June 2011. Adult beneficiaries comprise only 1.1 million.
As
a result, millions of unemployed parents "have little access to
means-tested income support programs." A new generation of poor
resulted. They include "households with children living on virtually no
income."
Children
always are harmed most. Since November 2008, those affected increased
dramatically at a time safety net protections are way inadequate and
eroding.
Demographically, married couples comprised 37% of extreme poverty households. For single females, it's 51%.
About 48% of affected households are headed by White non-Hispanics, 25% by Blacks, and 22% by Hispanics.
NPC added:"Thus,
extreme poverty is not limited to households headed by single mothers
or disadvantaged minorities, though the percentage growth in extreme
poverty over our study period was greatest among these groups."
It
also said eroding social benefits are "leaving many households with
children behind." They haven't enough resources to get by. TANF and
other forced austerity bear most blame.
Given
bipartisan agreement for additional deep cuts, America's most
vulnerable more than ever are on their own out of luck because policy
makers able to prevent it don't give a damn.
Cold
hard truths reveal what they and complicit media scoundrels try hard to
suppress. Growing impoverished millions reflect America's dark side.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment